The blatant suggestion that comments by the likes of Albert, John and Al, are unwelcome, because they're not following some sort of prescribed direction and they're somehow getting in the way of the H/F accolades, is an affront to some of the most thoughtful and considerate contributors for decades on Audiogon and a distinct disservice to what well may be very fine cables!
My comments were in agreement with Al on listening priorities and apply to every piece of audio equipment made.
Forum topics that praise audio gear will likely draw comments both positive and negative. How each person conducts themselves is what keeps things informative and pleasant.
Heck, there's times I can't make up my mind about changes in my own system. It takes me forever to evolve things where I'm certain the direction was a correct one.
As for cable in general, all cable has a sound. Some people are going to love Audioquest or MIT or Transparent or High Fidelity Cables and someone else will not find any of those suitable.
Directly on topic of High Fidelity cables, I received a link to a video today that is brilliant!
It focuses on the technology Rick used to develop High Fidelity Cables. Wonder who else got the invite to view ?