Symphony 5th - best recording


My 3 year old son heard this on some kids show and wants the CD, I figured I can use this as an excuse to spend some $ on the finest recording I can find...any suggestions?
vaughn3d
I neglected to mention that Gardiner's set of Beethoven synphonies also uses period instruments, but I believe the smaller orchestra is even more crucial to interpreting the music as intended. Beethoven was very specific about the number of instruments and the tempi, actually indicating the metronome markings, not just general "allegro," "andante," "presto," etc. Perhaps Hogwood also uses the specified number of instruments per section.

A friend of mine who is partial to von Karajan's recordings didn't appreciate the Gardiner version. His comment was, "The tempi are so fast." I was puzzled, because they didn't seem too fast to me. Then I listened to the von Karajan; I felt the tempi were sluggish. So, I checked the timing. Turns out that the Gardiner tempi are usually slower! (Gardiner was also very attentive to the tempi specified by Beethoven.) The smaller orchestra is more nimble, more articulate, and much more energetic. That energy seems to create the impression of greater speed.

The beauty of music, however, is in the interpretation AND the infinite possibilities of interpretation.
I've got to side with Rushton, Kleiber's version is the one I keep coming back to. However, I just got a new SACD with Vanska and the Minnesota Orchestra that I'm listening to tonight. Given how much I like their Third, Eighth and Ninth, this might be a contender.
No, no; he means Prokofieff's 5th, the best 20th century 5th (arguments may now proceed).

I don't know. Is (C) Kleiber's too driven and the DG sound too glassy? How about Karl Boem's on DG? Warmer sound and a more flowing performance. But I'll bet our three-year-old won't care.

Steve O.