Wall St. Journal article


Anyone see the WSJ Thursday 9/25 about Metallica's latest cd "Death Magnetic" and how it was mastered for ipod's and was the loudest recording ever? The band wanted it to sound loud through earbuds. The mastering engineer was embarrassed to be associated with the project because we all know that by compressing levels at the mastering stage, the dynamics are completely lost. No subtle cymbals, no strumming guitars. No surprising nuances for audiophiles.Now I realize that Metallica is not exactly marketing to the audiophile set. However, Springsteen's latest cd "Magic" used the same strategy and I thought it sounded like crap.The recordings are designed for low end reproduction and not bringing out the best performance by the artist. If I want a wall of sound, I will crank up my maggies. Comments?
maxnewid
Can't blame them for marketing their product to the masses. My dad always says " I dunno why they quit making the big wood console tv's " and I keep telling him his 1 tv purchase every 10 or 20 years is not going to keep them in biz.
In an email even the recording engineer says "it's something I'm not proud of." He had to backpeddle after it was posted to a forum but still said his sentiment is the same and that he could have said it better. If you take one look at the waveform on the new album you can tell it's going to sound bad. In the WSJ, they compare the waveform of the new album compared with one of their older tunes, Black I believe. The difference is amazing. St. Auger sounded terrible - that snare drum and compression - oh. So bad. Metallic haven't released anything that sounded decent since And Justice for All. I'm embarassed for them - one of quite a few once great bands when they feel they have resort to DSP to make their stuff sound ok. p.s. did you see the documentary on them - "Making a Monster" something like that? They're a pathetic bunch not to mention Dave Mustaine's whining was as painful as it gets for a "heavy" metaller.
Perhaps if more artists and record producers, engineers, ect were involved with the "Turn It Up" organization then perhaps the industry could come up with some standards that would allow recordings to have more more dynamic range to them. I also wouldn't mind if quality recording would get a "Turn It Up' certification. Anyway, here's a link for Turn It Up and what they're all about.

http://www.turnmeup.org/
I appreciate the comments. The www.turnmeup.org site is a great idea and resource Cleaneduphippy. The links listed were very interesting, particularly the Rolling Stone article from last year. This problem is significantly larger than I was aware. To the other responders, I was not questioning the quality of the new Metallica album as much as the recording technique. The compressed music is probably great for your convertible or in a bar, but not in the comfort of my home. The new software programs that can correct pitch and rhythm sometimes make recordings sound too homogenous. Keith Moon and John Bonham's distinctive styles were part of the successful formula for Zeppelin and the Who-- mistakes and all. Wouldn't it be great if Lars could have crescendos in a song and build to a climactic ending like they used to.