beatle remasters on vinyl?

Like I say Coffee2... I'd have agreed with you in spades if I didn't own and listen extensively to the DSD Abkco reissues of the early Rolling Stones albums.

And if you think about it... does Trinity Sessions by the Cowboy Junkies on vinyl sound analogue (good) to ya? Guess what, sorry digital and there are many more.

Countless beautiful performances have been buggered up forever by digital masters. I would prefer artists just sticking to non digital formats whenever possible, just my opinion.

Happy (01001110?) Listening!

Digital has been a problem because it was a new medium, so remasters make sense, but I don't understand why they would remaster the vinyl?

>>10-25-09: Cyclonicman
but I don't understand why they would remaster the vinyl?<<

Really? I can think of a couple.

1. $
2. $$

Pardon my naivete!

£, ¥, €, or $... anyway you care to express it, Audiofeil might just be on to
something!

Cyclonicman, if I'm reading between your lines, and I would be one to agree,
why fix what isn't broke. The reasoning behind the RS catalog was that it was
being refreshed and prepared for SACD transfer though DSD and while they were
at it there was a small demand to give vinyl folks a chance to have a fresh
pressing, and some may think a better copy than the nasty careless dubs of the
eighties, unless you have a basement filled with first pressing on DECCA with no
boxing that you would be willing to share.... It goes without saying, but I'll say it
anyway, not everyone has a solid copy of everything. But many of us are trying!
So it goes with the early Parlophones in mono.

Happy (fresh vinyl) Listening!