Crossover upgrade capacitor question

Precisely matched smaller capacitors in parallel may work better than an equivalent large capacitor. A lot depends on geometry as well as the choice of dielectric. Remember that caps used in passive crossover see high voltages and therefore they change shape along with the signal flowing through them - this can add significant distortion in some cases and can affect dynamics. A better solution would be to go with active crossovers (using low level line signals) and consequently reduce this form of distortion and power loss substantially.

"Remember that caps used in passive crossover see high voltages and therefore they change shape along with the signal flowing through them - this can add significant distortion in some cases"

Both Claritycap MR and Duelund reportedly have design improvements that minimize this physical movement of the capacitor plates(resonance). Clarity has a white paper in which they claim that in extensive listening tests, low capacitor resonance was a greater factor than capacitor material, in determining listeners' perceptions of a capacitor's quality.

Bob, when I rebuilt my Merlin crossovers I found that adding a .015uf russian FT-1 teflon bypass cap in parallel with the stock midrange/woofer main cap made a small improvement in speed & precision of the driver. When the cap is fully broken in, I will remove it and listen carefully for the mid-range bump you describe.

Dgarretson,
I think you emailed me on the Clarity MR's once?
Anyway if your interested as I see you have been doing some tweaking I have yet found another application that the MR's did not fail.. They are actually perfect to be honest :-)

See link
http://www.audiocircle.com/circles/index.php?topic=62730.0

Undertow, yes, thanks for first recommending Claritycap MR & for the tour of your modded Jolida phono stage.

For loudspeaker use, my opinions mirror Undertow's.