Categories aside, no matter which side of the fence you sit on, once something is heard, and appreciated, and/or moves you, we all become subjectivists, don't we? :-)
The objectivist might say, after hearing, that the result confirms the data without needing to verify it. I say they are overlooking the fact that the data IS not needed if the result confirms on an auditory and emotional level (here comes that placebo argument).
We don't have to know the measurements, or how it works. Our ears tell us it does and, if good, our emotions respond sympathetically.
Let someone else test all they want, after the fact.
We do this all the time with all manner of equipment that have already been established and never give it a second thought. We swap out X for Y and it gets better or worse. Now, something wicked this way comes, and all bets are off?
Just try it for yourself
None of what I just said matters if the objectivist refuses to listen.
All the best,
Nonoise
The objectivist might say, after hearing, that the result confirms the data without needing to verify it. I say they are overlooking the fact that the data IS not needed if the result confirms on an auditory and emotional level (here comes that placebo argument).
We don't have to know the measurements, or how it works. Our ears tell us it does and, if good, our emotions respond sympathetically.
Let someone else test all they want, after the fact.
We do this all the time with all manner of equipment that have already been established and never give it a second thought. We swap out X for Y and it gets better or worse. Now, something wicked this way comes, and all bets are off?
Just try it for yourself
None of what I just said matters if the objectivist refuses to listen.
All the best,
Nonoise