While reviewing and advertising are handled by different groups, the editor, who has to answer to the big shots of the conglomerates that they report to knows all about both, or else he's not there for long.
The conglomerates that bought these rags did so for one reason - to make money. If the mags don't make money the editor is quickly replaced.
What do advertisers want? They want positive exposure, either in reviews or editorials (think Stereophile and Musical Fidelity).
To think that a mag is going to work hard for the benefit of a non-advertiser is bsurd. The more pages, the harder they'll work for you - or the more inclined they'll be to cut you a break, like not print a marginal review.
Look, this is pretty simple guys - you know, take care of those who take care of you.
Anyone who believes it's all benevolence and one-hand-not-knowing-what-the-other-is-doing between advertising and reviewing needs a serious reality check. Ask any editor of any specialty mag.
The conglomerates that bought these rags did so for one reason - to make money. If the mags don't make money the editor is quickly replaced.
What do advertisers want? They want positive exposure, either in reviews or editorials (think Stereophile and Musical Fidelity).
To think that a mag is going to work hard for the benefit of a non-advertiser is bsurd. The more pages, the harder they'll work for you - or the more inclined they'll be to cut you a break, like not print a marginal review.
Look, this is pretty simple guys - you know, take care of those who take care of you.
Anyone who believes it's all benevolence and one-hand-not-knowing-what-the-other-is-doing between advertising and reviewing needs a serious reality check. Ask any editor of any specialty mag.