Jazz for aficionados


Jazz for aficionados

I'm going to review records in my collection, and you'll be able to decide if they're worthy of your collection. These records are what I consider "must haves" for any jazz aficionado, and would be found in their collections. I wont review any record that's not on CD, nor will I review any record if the CD is markedly inferior. Fortunately, I only found 1 case where the CD was markedly inferior to the record.

Our first album is "Moanin" by Art Blakey and The Jazz Messengers. We have Lee Morgan , trumpet; Benney Golson, tenor sax; Bobby Timmons, piano; Jymie merrit, bass; Art Blakey, drums.

The title tune "Moanin" is by Bobby Timmons, it conveys the emotion of the title like no other tune I've ever heard, even better than any words could ever convey. This music pictures a person whose down to his last nickel, and all he can do is "moan".

"Along Came Betty" is a tune by Benny Golson, it reminds me of a Betty I once knew. She was gorgeous with a jazzy personality, and she moved smooth and easy, just like this tune. Somebody find me a time machine! Maybe you knew a Betty.

While the rest of the music is just fine, those are my favorite tunes. Why don't you share your, "must have" jazz albums with us.

Enjoy the music.
orpheus10
Learsfool:

I have that CD. With the singing done by Te Kanawa and Carreras. I didn't see Faddis credited in the notes. But I will play it, and listen for him.

Thanks

Cheers
Learsfool is exactly right, Faddis is best known as a lead teumpet player with great "high-chops". Personally, I have not been a fan of his jazz playing. It is true that he is a disciple of Dizzy,, but his jazz playing has often struck me as a lot of quantity without a lot of substance. I have never liked screech players who, when playing jazz, rely a lot on playing in the screech range to create the excitement without enough of the more subtle stuff to balance things out. Just my reaction to it.
Schubert, the GREAT Gil Shaham indeed! I too like the Korngold; in fact, I have grown to like much of his work. I recently had the opportunity to perform his "Much To Do Anout Nothing" Suite, a very interesting work with a lot of charm; and which, like many of his works, straddles a fine line between accessibility (and even frivolity) with musical substance and a lot compositional craft. Thanks for the heads up re Minnesota. I believe we will be seeing a lot more of that kind of thing; really good news!
O-10, great to see you back on the thread. As "second in command" :-) I would like to share a couple general observations about the direction of the thread which relate to some of your recent comments:

I find it interesting how we (I certainly include myself) sometimes tend to read into comments what we want or expect to see in the words of others; this, based on our own biases and expectations. Human nature. Personally, in spite of my own strong opinions, I try to not get too frazzled by commentary that may seem off the mark or even ridiculous to me. I try, with various amounts of success, to use it as an opportunity to challenge, have deeper dialogue and possibly learn something in the process. Sometimes it works; sometimes not.

This thread has existed for some time now and without digging too deeply into the specifics of its history, I think it is fair to say that one of the "controversies" has been the issue of the state of jazz and wether there is relevant new jazz being played/recorded today; or, wether good jazz is simply and only a thing of the past. To me there is no question that that answer is an unequivocal YES, jazz is alive and well. It has evolved as it always will and to try to keep it in the past is not only pointless, but goes counter to the spirit of the music. It merits the ungoing support of the listener. Case in point:

I recently posted a clip by an impressive young piano player. Some liked it some didn't; as expected. No one suggested that this young piano player was the end-all, nor that everyone should run out and buy his recordings instead of those of Peterson, Tatum or whoever. Simply, that here we have yet another example of a promising young player who may and will probably grow into something truly special. Jazz is still here and here to stay. Importanlty, I am glad to see a "softening" of the hard-line stance which was often expressed by the die-hards early in the history of the thread that there is nothing new of value happening today. For me, the constant, pointless, and unwarranted negativity about the state of jazz is tiresome, counterproductive and, ironically, damaging to the health of the music. The greats of this music and their greatness don't need to be protected from the impact of new music that may not comform to our individual idea of the perfect jazz; especially when the complaining is not accompanied by a solid suggestion of a "solution". Imo, it's far more productive to support the kind of environment where creativity is not stifled and simply let the cream rise to the top.
From "THE GREAT BULLSHIT DEBATE" :-)

****Does all / most of FREE, and AVANT-GARDE Jazz, fall under the category of BULLSHIT?**** - Rok

Frankly, and no disrespect meant, I think the answer is obvious: OF COURSE NOT. But, as usual, we each have to arrive at our own conclusions. And, as someone famous once said, if you have to ask.....

A milestone in the avant-gard jazz movement and, imo, one of the greatest jazz records ever (Tony Williams was 18 yrs old!!!):

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cklbhkm1HrE