Philosophy used in assembling your system?


When putting together your system were there any underlying desgin philosophies used? Some examples would be:

- Most expensive component you can afford in every category (Cost no object).
- Best Value in every category.
- Cost ratios between components (ex. Speakers = 40%, Cables = 15%, and source components = 45%).
- Components types, i.e. Tubes vs. Solid State, totally digital or all analog.
- Listening preferences.
- The ascetics of a particular component.
- Best deals you happen to find.
- Physical dimensions and sound characteristics of your target listening room.
- Spouse's budget
- None of the above

Any input is greatly appreciated!

Jeff
jeffhunter
Philosophy used in assembling your system?


Ummm.....Philosophy? Oh...yeah...um...put that list back up again........hmmmmm....I don't see 'Fly by the seat of your pants'.......

John :)
My philosophy was to keep it simple and analog. I wanted to keep the signal path as "clean" as possible; no circuit boards, amp topology is direct coupled, no crossover, no active preamplification, no DAC, etc.

Also, maximize return on dollar.
My philosophy:

1) Know what I'm willing to compromise.
2) Know what I'm not willing to compromise.
3) Research
4) Experiment

Aball, the real trick is getting a room to fit the speakers, not vice versa :)
No philosophy, my systems morph over time...just like me. I think of audio systems in much the same way, as I think of music...it's all good at some time or another.

I guess if I were setting up an audio system for someone else (from scratch)...I would want to know about that persons listening habits, I would want to look at, and discuss the room, and any setup issues I think we may run into.

Components...I would start with speaker choices (hundreds of choices here...depending?). So, I guess I'll 3rd the “Aball Method” for setting up a system from scratch.

Dave