All Kit are Band-Aids
@twoleftears I was confused at first, and no. The conspiracy theory he’s espousing has no relationship to recording equipment. He means the tuning frequency for A above middle-C. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A440_(pitch_standard) |
Also, OP, you used "discordant" wrong. The entire purpose of having a tuning standard is to ensure instruments are manufactured and tuned to the same frequency. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/discord#h1 Now had you come in here arguing keyboard temperament from the baroque until now, then we’d really have something to argue! Hahahahaha E |
My bad, yes, it is a tuning frequency and anyone involved in recording would/should know that the instruments being recorded should be tuned to 432 as it i harmonically richer than 440 which is discordant, as proven by numerous musicians in the YT video link I provided. So why aren't they? By the way, do you know who came up with the term Conspiracy Theory? Those who are behind all the deceptions, but where many of those so-called theories require an open mnd and occasionally a leap of faith, one can simply hear how much better 432 tuning sounds |
My bad, yes, it is a tuning frequency and anyone involved in recording would/should know that the instruments being recorded should be tuned to 432 as it i harmonically richer than 440 which is discordant, as proven by numerous musicians in the YT video link I provided. Hahahaha, BS. To all of it. "Harmonically richer" - Please, in what musical or audio theory can any frequency be richer than another?
Cite your source. Let’s see, you got the dates wrong, you attributed 440Hz to the Nazi’s, you claimed it had an effect on recording equipment (it doesn't), you used "discordant" wrong and now you want to claim it’s’ "harmonically richer?" Do you even know what that means? Hahahaha. |
