Conrad Johnson Repair Issues


The Post I Never Dreamed I’d Write
About two weeks ago I sent my beloved Conrad Johnson Premier-17 back to
the Conrad Johnson factory for repair because it stopped making any sound whatsoever. It apparently blew some internal component.
I soon received an email acknowledging receipt of the unit and an estimated bill
of about $523.00 not including parts.
On 10/14/2016 I got a phone message telling me the preamp was fixed & total charges were $579.00.
I called a few days ago to give my credit card info to pay for the repairs. The CJ
employee told me that “we also need to tell you that the unit was damaged during
shipping & the damages are not repairable because it involves damage to the structure of the unit & those metal parts are no longer available." The damage was not mentioned until that point.
Photos showed the actual frame of the preamp was twisted & bent. It looked like it had been dropped off a two story building without the box.
The repair manager felt it would be pointless to file an insurance claim because
they would automatically deny any claim where the box was not damaged & refused to assist me with any insurance issues.
The CJ phone rep assured me that Mr. Johnson, the owner, would call me that afternoon but he never did.
I did get a call from the repair employee who said they just want to
get my payment information & send my preamp to me.
I shipped U.S. Post Office & insured for $2000.00.
I’m shocked to have this happen with this company. I've had several pieces of equipment repaired by them with great service.
I would appreciate any advice. I'm a little shaken & confused.
I’m really shocked that this would happen with a company of this stature.
I've stayed with this brand over the years because of their reliability & reputation for integrity.
It really doesn’t look like shipping damage to me.Shouldn’t they at least be willing to
assist with insurance issues?
This is one of the more unpleasant customer service experiences I've had in a while.

128x128pereza
OP, CJ & Agon owe it to the community to keep the thread up and get a response from both sides. Anything less will be begging for info. Cheers,
Spencer
We have a CJ sales point here in Tucson.  Small dealer. working out of his house, I am certain he just loves having this thread stretch into infinity.  CJ has been called into question ........  small dealers cannot withstand claims of bad customer service.

@sbank and @almarg have  amazing patience, (saint like really) (boggles the mind) @rocray is more on point - looks like OP has a bad case of the trolls.

i join with @rocary in calling BS!
Honeybee, my wife & daughters will tell you otherwise! Hey, I'm not saying that a long time should pass. Frankly, both should reply immediately! The OP, I suspect is a troll, and we'll never hear from him again. Any moderators reading this might want to investigate. 
But taking down the thread is what would hurt the small dealers. If CJ is ultimately cleared here, future readers should be able to read that when they hear a watered down recollection of this mess far in the future. Cheers,
Spencer
With the continuing passage of time and no response from pereza, it has become evermore clear that this post is either a hoax or an exercise in badly flawed judgement. Why then, should CJ choose to dignify it by entering into a public debate?  

CJ is a small company (I believe on the order of 10-15 people). Mega companies like BMW, GM, Apple, Microsoft, etc. and their dealers must receive thousands of such complaints daily. They also have huge staffs to deal with service, marketing and public relations issues. Nonetheless, something like this would be dealt with in the manner that CJ already has - directly with their customer. That's an industry best practice, why should they do more?  

Pereza via the original post initiated this plea for advice and presumably support to all of us. He's now missing in action. The rest of us are clamoring for more from him. His non response is deafening with its silence. We've been fooled and it's time to move on. Removing this entire post sense makes for the reasons I've cited, it's a sham, why allow it to continue?