First mentioning ANECDOTALLY a TV host is no reason to threw a science paper in a basket with a gesture of temper...( save for politically TV programmed mind)
Second The entire article is about this : " This report presented information derived from analysis of the first 250 COVID-19 vaccine related deaths" not 13 deaths....
In all these 250 deaths only 13 are from allergic reaction the other causes of deaths are in very high probabilities related to the vaccines...The article authors ask for a more complete analysis of all cases and will do....
Vaccines may kill by other means than immediate allergic reaction...you dont know that?
Then your answer is a desesperate answer with falsification of the analysis truth to serve your political BIAS....
Anyway your brain is probably foggy because of the 6 authors about a statistical analysis report about vaccines adverse events it is mandatory to have among the writers at least ONE specialist in statistic and informatic...Then mentioning this fact about one writer, among the 6, against this analysis is stupidity or bad faith.... Pick the reason you wanted to....
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352837543_Analysis_of_COVID-19_vaccine_death_reports_from_the_Vaccine_Adverse_Events_Reporting_System_VAERS_Database_Interim_Results_and_Analysis It is more easy to pick holes in your posts than to pick fleas on a never washed dog....