I prefer cable brands that are tuned to convey the music in most natural way without emphasizing any elements of a recording.
How accurate are cable descriptions for your system?
Steve Huff, whose videos I typically like on YouTube is now reporting this about some cables:
SVS Ultra Cables can be found at Amazon for just about $100 for an 8 foot pair. These will bring a bit more bass to your sound but are less refined.
Tuneful cables are light and have a nice design. They are leaner, and faster but also very good. You can find them for $79 for a 12 foot pair at Amazon HERE.
QUESTION: To what degree can his descriptions be taken as "likely true" for any given (sufficiently resolving) system?
I ask this for people who have found that cables DO make a difference (to their ears, in their system) and deniers will be ignored.
https://www.stevehuffphoto.com/my-fave-speaker-cables-under-100-hifi-quality/
- ...
- 48 posts total
The Tuneful cables are a Belden cable. Similar to what Bluejeans cable do, , They buy the bulk Belden cables and terminate them. Not meant as a slur on BJ, just a fact. I suspect the same from SVS & the other co. on Amazon. IF one is not inclined to DIY, then I suspect BJ or the others are a good buy. I am considering a set of speaker cables from Canare which I have been told that were better than some $1K+ cables. Sincce I have silver, I'm considering the Canare (Blueejeans) or DIY if I don't do the Silversmith Fideliums which get great reviews |
Thanks to posters. I suppose I’m still interested in your answer to the question in the OP. Let me rephrase it: When you hear cables described in a certain way -- but not specific to your system -- how accurately do you find those descriptions matching up to what you eventually here, if you try the cables?
|
I’d give it some credence. But it often comes down to a matter of scale. IOW, the bass may be 90% for one and 10% for another. It also depends upon which speaker cable you went from to the new one. What happens when your your existing cables naturally have more/better bass than the ones in question? Maybe your existing cables are giving 100% of what they are getting from the amp. The ones in questions can do no better than 100%. So in essence, there are a lot of variables which can rear their head when you speak in generalities. But generally speaking, Id give credence to the posters opinion. Hows that for circling around? 😀 |
@hilde45 - the answer to your question really is - you get what you pay for ! $100 cables are generally mediocre performers because
If the budget allows look at Zavfino cables - for a little more money you will get
Take a look at the Zavfino thread for more information about them These are very good cables to start out with Arcadia OCC Interconnect Cable - ZavfinoUSA As for your question
I do not pay any attention to cable reviews because...
This hobby is very subjective
Also, we tend to review any component/cable using our favourite tracks, which may not bring out the best in their performance
The secret to reviewing anything is to find tracks that cover a wide selection of sounds and not just favourite tracks Hope that helps - Steve |
- 48 posts total