+1 @hilde45
And many of dearest non-friends are solipsists!
How Audiphiles are Different
So, I can’t spell Audiophile. Doh.
Again, moving this to a new thread to avoid polluting the OP that got me thinking about this.
A couple of events have intersected for me which made me realize just how very different audiophiles can be. Not just in their tastes but the very way in which the ear/brain mechanism is wired for them. This then profoundly affects their priorities in equipment and rooms. There is no one right way to be but those who argue purity of reproduction is the only reason to be an audiphile, well, I have news for you...
At a show many years ago the rooms varied a great deal in the amount of acoustic treatments. Some very expensive gear was in some really poor sounding rooms. From a couple of these rooms I overheard several participants talk about how great the demos were. I was a little surprised. I couldn’t hear anything. All I could hear was the ocean spray of the room.
After this somewhere I read about how exhausting meeting room and class rooms can be. Our brain is always listening through the room acoustics for words. This takes effort. In a reflective room we literally burn more calories just listening than we do in a dampened room. It makes it harder to study or listen, and we get tired more quickly. I’ve also thought about how musicians listen and how many of them don’t hear the recording or the room, they hear the musician's technique. Their brain’s entire symbol system and language is wired to feel technique and expression.
I have hypothesized these things:
And as a result:
All of this is just about ear / brain mechanisms. It’s also possible some of us have physical receptors or a combination of different ears/different brains which cause us to hear differently. I remember chatting with a rare lady who was an audiophile and she pointed out that for years she couldn’t listen to DAC’s. They gave her headaches. This was about the same time that DAC’s started getting good at Redbook playback.
What are your thoughts?
+1 @hilde45 And many of dearest non-friends are solipsists! |
Having spent many of my formative years singing in acapella choirs my ear/brain have become very sensitive to timbre and pitch. But interestingly (probably to me only) is that most ambient noise doesn't bother me at all. BTW I sing along a lot of the time while listening. To answer Erik's question...I think we are different simply because we love music to a degree where we will spend precious time/energy/treasure in our pursuit of a playback system that achieves a level where the magic happens. Regards, barts
|
Great TED talk. We're all different because art, as they say, is subjective, and music is, if nothing else, the epitome of art. I guess that makes all of us a bit of a solipsist as we can only speak of ourselves when it comes to music appreciation. Try telling that to someone who only hears "measured sound". 👍 All the best, |
Have you ever been at a concert where the orchestra sounds better after the intermission? Did the orchestra or your hearing adjust to the room? Have you ever been tucked away in the upper corner of the Musikverein in Vienna and found the sound of the Vienna Philharmonic to be just as ravishing as in the center stalls? Even though you couldn't see a single musician. There is magic in that hall. Did you ever listen through the noise on the Unicorn recording of Furtwangler conducting Brahm's German Requiem? And been moved to tears. * Mr. Rose of Pristine Recordings has worked miracles cleaning up this recording while preserving the emotion.
|