Itching for better sound
Thank you. Just took a look at those Klipsch Heresys. They look gorgeous, but the "made to rock" slogan on the website gave me pause. I'd love to know whether people think some speakers are better for classical music than others. I don't want "made to rock" unless it's a Mahler kind of rocking. Think the "hammer blows" in his 6th. |
Shostakovich knew how to rock. Take the tenth as an example. A good speaker will play anything. I think what they mean is the little speakers will play very loud with minimal power. Put subwoofers under these speakers and you can make a very sizable presentation. If you really want to knock yourself out the back door with say, The Firebird check out the Cornwalls (also Klipsch) Both these speakers are very detailed without getting harsh. You get a lot of speaker for the money and most importantly it does not take huge amounts of power to drive them. The speakers that are noticeably better are way more expensive and generally less efficient. These you will be able to drive fine with your old receiver until you can afford to upgrade your electronics. A 60 watt/ch tube amp would be perfect:) |
Your receiver really will be a limiting factor with whatever speakers you choose. The Klipsch are very sensitive and your receiver will drive them. The KEF LS50 requires a good amp with sufficient power to get the best out of them. These speakers have a different sonic signature and I would suggest you listen to them to see which you prefer. A speaker at the $500 price point that I would suggest is the Wharfedale Denton 80th. They are available online and you can return them if you don't like them. I actually preferred them over the KEF LS50 and I am a long time KEF fan currently running several different KEF speakers in 3 systems. |
I recommend a Yamaha A-S801 integrated amplifier. If you don't need the Video features of your AVR this will make your PSB speakers sound brand new and will pair well with any other new speakers you bring in. I addition you can try the built-in DAC on the A-S801 via optical/coax from your Marantz - you might prefer that clean Sabre sound. Two upgrades in one! |
+ for the Rogue i own a pair of Cornwall’s, they would not be my first choice for The Ressurection, but they also would not be the last.... btw I caught a Cleveland Symphony performance where they used a large leather clad sheet of plywood and a sledge for emphasis !!!! Have fun, get out to dealers and listen, enjoy the music |
Was that plywood/sledge for the famous "hammer blows" in Mahler 6? I'll be attending Mahler 2020 festival at the Concertgebouw in May--NY, Berlin, Vienna Phil among others. That should whip even the finest audiophile equipment, and it's why I can't afford any major upgrades just now. Thanks to everyone for their input. I will keep my ears out for the right amp! |
I would go for the Yamaha, it has the most power of the three and the lowest price. The Marantz seems a little under powered. The Cambridge does not have tone controls which may or may not be an issue for you. Of course the sound quality is the most important and I have only heard the Yamaha and it seems to be a pretty nice sounding amp. |
Short answer, yes you should hear a significant improvement by swapping the AVR for an integrated stereo amp. But I have to ask, why do you need two sets of speaker output terminals? Anyway, with the Denon you’re not only using a compromised amp but also, at least as importantly, a compromised preamp. By compromised I mean that they’re designed to meet a competitive price point, so expensive yet crucial electrical components — such as power supplies, etc. — are usually of lower quality and significantly affect the quality of the resulting sound reproduction. The amp/pre sections are also bombarded by a litany of other noisy electronics necessary for an AVR to do all the things it needs to do (DAC, digital signal processing, etc.) as they all reside in the same case. So by adding a dedicated integrated stereo amp you get higher quality components, more focused and accomplished circuitry and design, and less inherent noise you’re likely to hear a notable improvement, especially as your speakers are refined and revealing enough to convey such differences. Things such as bass weight and definition, cleaner and extended treble detail and air, image separation and solidity, soundstage width/depth/height, ability for sound to separate from the physical speakers themselves, tonal richness and shadings, micro/macro dynamics, as well as overall transparency should all improve markedly. And when you combine all these improvements it results in a totally different and more believable, involving, and more rewarding listening experience. Lastly, one of the reasons I recommended the Sphinx is that it comes from a very highly regarded designer/manufacturer with an impeccable reputation for service, and it benefits from the trickle down of technology and design implementation from its more expensive siblings in the Rogue lineup. And although it’ll sound great with its stock input tube, you have the flexibility to change the inexpensive tube to custom tailor the sound to your specific liking. Moreover, it’s good enough to reward you for any speaker upgrades you make in the future, and as the Sphinx doubles its power output to 200Wpc at 4 Ohms impedance it has the juice to easily drive just about any speaker you throw at it. But, amps are still a personal choice based on individual personal tastes, so I thought this excerpt from a CNET review of the Yammy A-S801 might help put things in perspective and help with your decision... “While the A-S801’s competence was never in doubt it lacks the more "robust" character of the $1,295 Rogue Sphinx amp’s sound. The Sphinx is a cool running vacuum tube/Class D hybrid design that sounds like a classic 1980s high-end integrated amplifier. The Sphinx is rated at 100 watts per channel for 8 ohm speakers, 200 watts per for 4 ohm speakers. There’s more body and soul to the Sphinx sound, the A-S801 is tonally cooler and lighter on its feet. Which one is better? I prefer the Sphinx, but tastes vary, you might go for the A-S801.” Hope this helps, and best of luck. |
Thanks so much for that thorough explanation. As a non-audiophile, it's hard for me to figure out how amp and not speakers will make the biggest difference, but I've listened to all the people here. For a number of reasons, I often like to have the same music playing in two rooms, hence the two sets of speakers. |
Heresy IIIs are indeed a high end speaker and reveal what's in front of them beautifully and very efficiently with, of course, all sorts of music from BB to Britton (no good speaker system is "music specific")...very balanced and coherent sound, and now perhaps less expensive since Heresy IVs were released recently. A bargain great sounding speaker. Don't trust the opinions of old white dudes in red ties, have a listen for yourself. |
The A+B Speaker terminals is the only thing holding me back from trying a Sphinx - I've heard consistently great things. I use the Yamaha with 4x 6ohm speakers in a large, 500 sqft room. Sometimes I turn it up really loud. It doesn't break a sweat. My upgrade path was Yamaha AVR -> Marantz PM6005 -> Rotel Int -> Classic NAD Int -> Yamaha A-S801. Those other amps didn't last long in the room. The Yamaha has been here for 2 years. The Yamaha leaves little to desire. Good luck! |
