IMHO, with
jazz you get both – good music and good sound. Like @whipsaw mentioned, Rudy
Van Gelder (Blue Note) engineered tons of material from the bebop/hard bop/post-bop
eras. Several other labels had good production quality as well, like Prestige,
Riverside, Columbia, Verve, and Impulse. I don’t know if there was an unspoken standard
or a small group traveling within that genre, but most of the stuff they
produced was pretty consistently good.
Yeah
rock, R&B, even blues, can be all over the place. But again, I think that
was a function of engineering and where/how they were recorded. Earth, Wind and
Fire’s first album sounded like it was recorded in someone’s garage. Their sound
improved substantially with the move to Columbia. Chicago (CTA) put out great
stuff with Columbia as well.
The
other day, remembering my high school days, put on “Stand” by Sly & the
Family Stone. It was pretty bad. I liked that album playing on the system I had
back then. If one’s system is fairly resolving, capable of faithfully
reproducing what’s been recorded, then sound quality will necessarily vary
based on how well it’s been engineered. It’s the old adage “garbage in garbage
out” at work.
One
last thing, keeping with the central theme: is it the music or the sound? I had
a plumber doing some work and I asked him “… anything or anybody you care to
hear while you’re working?” He suggested Vince Gill, Randy Travis, and a couple
of other country artists I can’t remember. That day – song after song - I
discovered how much high quality sound comes out of Nashville. Those guys really
know how to engineer great sounding music! Am I now a country music fan? Well
no, all things being equal, music trumps sound. Just saying …