I’m going to leave my prior work on this subject here, and then stop. The OP deserves to have this thread focused on the original topic. Not my personal views on the reliability or lack of a particular reviewer.
Here:
https://speakermakersjourney.blogspot.com/2016/05/stereophile-reviews-data-doesnt-lie.html
and here we show he’s not sticking to his own claims:
https://speakermakersjourney.blogspot.com/2016/12/stereophile-data-part-ii.html
and here is a great example of JA not understanding the data he’s’ looking at. NOT the first time:
https://speakermakersjourney.blogspot.com/2016/09/stereophile-slanders-crystal-cable.html
Last posting I make in this thread. Anyone wanting to discuss, we need to take it to another thread out of courtesy.
As always, please please buy what you like. It's your money. Enjoying what JA enjoys won't upset me one bit. Just don't ask me to support a claim he's all that knowledgeable or unbiased. He IS the bias.
Here:
https://speakermakersjourney.blogspot.com/2016/05/stereophile-reviews-data-doesnt-lie.html
and here we show he’s not sticking to his own claims:
https://speakermakersjourney.blogspot.com/2016/12/stereophile-data-part-ii.html
and here is a great example of JA not understanding the data he’s’ looking at. NOT the first time:
https://speakermakersjourney.blogspot.com/2016/09/stereophile-slanders-crystal-cable.html
Last posting I make in this thread. Anyone wanting to discuss, we need to take it to another thread out of courtesy.
As always, please please buy what you like. It's your money. Enjoying what JA enjoys won't upset me one bit. Just don't ask me to support a claim he's all that knowledgeable or unbiased. He IS the bias.