Review: Pure Fidelity Harmony Turntable

It looks compact but beautiful. 

Looks nicely made, but the motor is puny - probably why you discern bass issue.

It seems strange that you waxed lyrical about the Sempersonus - suggesting it was the best thing since sliced bread, and now its not so great.

I guess by next year you'll find another best of breed ...

For the same money I'd buy the Rega P10, it has a great pedigree and shocked Michael Fremer with its performance level compared to his megabucks.

@dover I don't have a lot of information about the motor but I do prefer the subplatter arrangement on the Harmony (like the Rega) over driving the edge of the platter (like VPI). I also appreciate the use of dual belts to drive the subplatter which should theoretically provide more consistent speed by helping to counteract stylus drag. In framing my comments to tried to acknowledge the many positive attributes of the Sempersonus--I stand behind my assessment of that table. (Could it be possible that both tables perform at a very high level?)  My issues with the TE-2 had to do with shipping damage and the challenges of obtaining replacement parts given supply chain issues. The TE-2 is a great sounding table and once the packing and fit/finish challenges are resolved an easy recommendation. The Harmony, however, is simply better built all around with better execution (fit/finish). It is also quieter than the TE-2 and more transparent. The TE-2 seemed to have better drive and PRaT on many recordings. I am fortunate to have used the same cartridge on both setups. It is rare for many of us to compare turntables head-to-head. I think my comments fairly capture the strengths and weaknesses of the Harmony in comparison with the TE-2. My purpose in posting is to allow others to benefit from what I have been able to observe in listening to two table/arm combinations at roughly the same price point. Obviously, folks are welcome to take or leave what I have shared but best done without the snark, which doesn't really move the conversation forward.

A turntable that looks like a turntable-what a concept! Do you have the arm as the model on the webpage? Interesting weight housing of the antiskate. Nice clean look. Enjoy it.

@tablejockey Thank you! Pure Fidelity offers a special version of the Origin Live Illustrious (called the "SE") with any of the tables in their lineup. I almost chose that option but I have wanted a OL Conqueror for some time and as the next model up the chain is said to outperform the Illustrious by a noticeable margin. I also needed a slightly longer set of ICs so was going to have to order from the factory special anyway so decided to go for it. My timing was good in that OL had just released a MK4 version of the Conqueror which had not seen improvements in many years so I was able to get the most recent version. I think for most folks the Illustrious would be an excellent choice--I prefer the OL arms to the Acoustic Signature offerings. The Harmony or Horizon with the Illustrious SE as a package would bring the price down and probably sacrifice little by way of performance.

I have a friend that recently picked up the Harmony with an Acoustic Signature signature tonearm.  This is a beautiful table.  I am very familiar with your Origin Live tonearm as I use an Enterprise 4 and Illustrious 3c on my OL Sovereign TT.  The Acoustic Signature and Origin Live arms use the same pivot to spindle distance of 223mm which is the base design for the Pure Fidelity TTs.  The weight of the Harmony's platter and sub platter provide enough inertia that the 12 VAC AC motor and its custom power supply can easily maintain excellent drive and speed consistency.  The power supply is designed to initially start out at a lower speed and once the platter is rotating the power supply increases output to reach and maintain the desired speed.  Well designed and executed based on listening and participating in the initial setup of the table.  The only issue we encountered is the spindle diameter is on the upper end of the specification range and is extremely tight on some records.  Congratulations on your fine table and tonearm.

Rick

@drrsutliff Thanks, Rick. Thanks for mentioning the "soft start" feature--I neglected to mention this in my review. I like the way it powers up to full speed and have found speed stability exceptional. Piano recordings have the pitch stability of digital without smearing of the notes. I have not encountered any issues with the spindle diameter as of yet The record weight/clamp provided does a surprisingly good job and has good ergonomics. Overall, this is a very well designed and constructed table. I was a little hesitant to order a custom finish--their wood veneers are very well done--but I wanted black without the glossy bling factor. John went back and forth with me to get just the right level of sheen on the satin finish. It looks great and the application is even and perfect. Really well done!

Nice review. If I was in the market, it would be on the short list.

Nice review of the Harmony.  It's a great turntable that I have been very happy with over the last three or so months that I have owned it.  I stuck with the Acoustic Signature tonearm on mine and really like it.  I wanted as close to set and forget as possible on this table and I've heard the Origin arm height sometimes needs to repositioned.

To my ears, the PF has great PRAT and the bass really explodes out of the black backgrounds, but I'm comparing it to the VPIs and Regas that I have owned, and the PF is a much better table than anything I've heard from either of those two brands.  I have not spent any time with idler drive tables though.  I'd love to spend time with restored Garrard at some point.

I think the real trick that the John gets so right on these tables is the overall sonic balance between tone/texture/PRAT/Slam.  It doesn't really exaggerate one at the expense of another which leaves a wonderfully balanced and engaging listen.  Later this year, I'm going to try to DS Audio 003 optical cartridge and "energizer" with my Harmony to see how that sounds.  But I want to spends more time as currently set up first.

I am not familiar with your equipment, but am quite familiar with changing the perception of a quality of Bass Note by working with Sub Plinth Assemblies and Platter Mats on TT's.

With the results achieved creating a Sub Plinth construction on mainly Idler and Direct Drives, I am sure the same can be produced for Belt Drive TT's as well. My own Belt Drive TT is not regularly used at present.

When it comes to Platter Mats, I have made my own ones available for loan to Belt Drive TT owners, and there has been some very good experiences had by the TT owners, and some of my materials have been adopted to be used.

I believe the environment the TT is used in has a influence on the SQ and presentation, which makes many TT's in their dedicated environment unique and not ubiquitous. To spend a little extra time trialling with methods for creating a structure to support the TT, can yield results that are quite attractive and noticeably improved. 

Your description makes it known that the Plinth Design already has a system in place to work with managing transferred energies, which is sounding like a design that has been thought through.

A additional Sub Plinth arrangement can be a very worthwhile ancillary to work with what is already in place.

Granite Works for me as the Sub Plinth to be built off. It is a course granular igneous rock due to its formation. It offers properties that align themselves to being Massey and also for a rock, has a efficient Dissipation when managing energies transferred to it.

A Suspension Footer with a good damping material seated upon it, with the Granite on top is a very good first tier of a structure.   

Slate has its followers and I was once quite interested in the use of it, but after my research on rock types and learning that the layered formation acts as reflective surface when managing transferred energies, this become a rock that was not the most desirable to have.

I chose to stay closer to Granite for its dissipation qualities, and do feel the benefits on offer for maintaining this choice are being repaid.

Most recently Densified Wood has proven to be very effective as a Sub Plinth Material and does bring something to the SQ that is attractive, maybe a little less smearing, or the overall envelope is better defined, it is early days yet with this material.    

I don't care for MDF as a structural material for a turntable plinth, but other than that, this looks like a well thought out and well built turntable that I guess would sound fine.  None of it is groundbreaking, but they chose good ideas from a number of other existing turntables and melded them together nicely. I also imagine the thick solid alu base firmly bonded to the upper plinth ameliorates much of what I don't like about MDF.  The veneer would help too.

I’ve had my Pure Fidelity Harmony for about 3 weeks now, and my early assessment is quite similar to yours, aside from the Maestro box criticisms and the occasional lack of PRaT on lesser produced records. In short I’m ecstatic with mine, but I will say that I have a lot less turntable experience than it sounds like you’ve had. I am coming from a $400 Technics SL-1200Mk2 with an Ortofon 2M Blue cart. So naturally the jump in fidelity is going to be quite noticeable though I still think the Technics is a GREAT table. 

John and his team did a custom tint on my quilted maple to match my bosse cedar Volti Rival speakers and they did an absolutely stunning job, it really is a perfect match. 

My Harmony is equipped with the Illustrious SE tone arm and the Stratos cartridge and it sounds transparent, silky, a touch shy on detail when compared to the Technics/2M Blue but the depth of the soundstage is stunning… 

I save highest praise for the build quality, as the OP described, it really is an heirloom piece. I haven’t spent this kind of money on anything else in my system besides my speakers but like my speakers I know that this piece will likely never leave my system. Of course I could see eventually down the road experimenting with other amps, preamps, streamers, DACs, etc. But just as the Volti Rivals have a permanent home in my system, the Pure Fidelity Harmony will be the last turntable I buy.

 

Update:

 

I thought I would circle back to provide an update on my experience with the PF Harmony now that I have plenty of miles on the table and, more importantly, to include some comments on the new Conductor speed control unit. If you read my initial “review” you gathered that I saw and heard two areas for improvement in the original Harmony. The Maestro speed control unit was not up to the same fit, finish, and functionality of the table itself AND the Harmony didn’t carry a tune as well as my prior idler-type record spinner. To elaborate, I experienced a very slight loss of rhythmic propulsion and what seemed to be an equally subtle smearing of the notes on solo piano that became evident on some LPs with very naturally recorded initial transients, bloom, and decay.  I am happy to report that the Conductor speed control unit resolves both of these concerns in spades. 

 

The unit replaces the two piece Maestro speed controller by condensing the electronics into one gorgeous, finely crafted unit. (If you are interested you can see the two units in a comparison photo on my systems page and watch a video on the Conductor for more information). Not only is the Conductor far superior in build quality, but it is also a big ergonomic improvement. The push buttons have a firm feel and click into place with confident authority and they are illuminated to provide clear indication of on-off and speed selection. The speed selector switches flash briefly upon engagement until the platter reaches the selected speed and the controller maintains a steady rotation of the platter. (There are also trim pots on the rear of the unit which can be used to dial in speed accuracy if necessary). Simply put, the Conductor speed control unit is now the aesthetic and functional equivalent of the incredibly well-made and beautiful Harmony turntable. 

 

Turning to the sound quality, I was able to do a (somewhat) immediate A-B comparison of the Maestro and Conductor units (with a two hour lag for the retrofit) using the same recordings I relied upon for my initial “review”. While I cannot explain the technical reasons for my conclusions, I can say with a fair degree of confidence that the Conductor eliminates any small speed deviations that may have contributed to the slight smearing and lack of PRaT I had experienced with the Maestro running the show. Acoustic bass is tight, propulsive, and real. Solo piano has all the transient attack, bloom, and decay of the real deal. The Conductor really seems to take stronger command of the platter rotation and bring out the best of what the Harmony has to offer. It is also important to note that the new speed control unit does not detract in any way from the superlative attributes of the table noted in my initial review–the lack of self-noise and overall transparency to the source that I value greatly when spinning records. 

 

The Conductor retrofit was easy if you are reasonably handy. I was able to elevate the table on my workbench, access and remove the motor cover from below, and replace the motor without removing the arm or upsetting cartridge alignment, VTA, VTF, etc. I was done in under two hours. I’m not sure whether the Conductor will replace the Maestro on their complete lineup or just the topline Harmony and Horizon models but, to their credit, PF will make the new unit available to Maestro owners who want to upgrade–price TBD.

 

So it’s actually a different motor with the new speed controller box?

Yes, the motor is replaced as part of the retrofit. However, the motor looks similar to the one it replaces.

How does the new controller sense the platter speed, so as to correct it for momentary perturbations?  Is there a sensor under the platter, for example?

For those interested in learning more the latest issue of Stereophile features an in-depth review of the Harmony with the new Conductor speed control unit. The review describes the engineering and build quality well and pretty much takes a shotgun approach with the accolades. But while there IS much to admire with this table I am sticking to my guns on what distinguishes it from other competent designs that I have experienced—it is super quiet, very transparent to the source, and beautifully designed and built. Loaded with an OL arm this table will get you where you want to be without breaking the bank.

@lewm There is no sensor feedback to the motor. The Conductor uses a sophisticated quartz lock control over the motor and the flywheel effect of the thick delrin platter and stainless steel/aluminum sub platter driven by two belts is designed to maintain speed and counteract stylus drag.

@dodgealum  Interesting about the motor change.  I'm not sure my dealer knows that, he mentioned it's just a cable change to the motor.  Not sure the new speed controller is worth the $2K asking price, but I will get to ask more questions at the Capitol Audio Fest this weekend where a couple of the rooms will feature the Pure Fidelity turntables.  Thanks!

@badgerdms The new motor comes with the cable hard wired and the lead attaches to the new speed control unit. It is an easy swap. The more I listen the more sonic benefits of the Conductor become apparent. It does make a difference and also significantly elevates the fit and finish of the entire playback system. Given the cost of the table and the performance/aesthetic gains I think it is worth the coin to do the upgrade but obviously this is a personal judgement call. I spun some vintage jazz last night and the propulsive toe-tapping quality that was slightly lacking with the Maestro governing the motor was there in spades. There is simply better musical flow with the Conductor on board.

I have had the Harmony (quilted maple) for about 6 months and it is terrific, have the OL Illustrious arm and dynavector cart. into an Icon audio ps3mk2 phono stage.

Punchy, full, open and musically engaging.....just like real music, all with regular everyday records. I use it with modest gear, source 1st really makes the difference.

Have owned lots o tables including 2 LP12s, the harmony raises and sets the bar.

Need to save my pennies to upgrade the power supply....off to work I go.

 

Ben R.

For those who are interested a new review of the Harmony just popped on Audiophilia which covers MK 2 updates and the new Conductor speed control unit.

https://www.audiophilia.com/reviews/2019/3/8/pure-fidelity-harmony-turntable

badger, In my universal experience with other types of devices that improve speed stability, the resulting improvement in SQ is much more than worth the cost; such advancements are usually transformative. (And for some reason, the cost of such an upgrade, no matter how manifested, is usually ca $2000.) Dodgealum is an experienced and unbiased listener (except in the sense that he paid for the new PS, so he is inclined to like it), nevertheless I would say "go for it".

I don't know what that turntable sounds like (great I'm sure), but it makes the new Linn LP12 50th Anniversary table look like a Goodwill leftover. It is simply beautiful!

+1 for roxy.  I was thinking the same thoughts but did not want to offend the Linn faithful.  Not only does the PF get the nod for its looks, but also for its engineering.  The Delrin platter is to be desired because its hardness mimics that of a vinyl LP, thereby facilitating energy absorption rather than reflection.  The motor pulley is right up close to the circumference of the subplatter, thereby reducing the propensity for belt slip and belt creep.  The use of the subplatter probably also reduces the transmission of noise and spurious energy from the motor pulley into the main platter.  And the new PS/speed controller is probably the equal of the current best from Linn. Etc.

Not to revive an old thread, but I finally added the Conductor speed controller and its motor in place of the Maestro.  It makes a pretty profound difference.  The last record I played before the change was an original copy of XTC's Skylarking, which sounded fine, but nothing to write home about.  With the Conductor in place, the increase in bass on that record was immediately noticeable, as was a better delineation of instruments in space and even better pace.  A very worthwhile improvement and makes the Harmony compete with anything in its price range IMO.

If you are going down the road of improving Speed Control, this goes hand in glove with having a platter Spindle that rotates as a non eccentric rotation.

Eccentric Rotations are a cause off Wow and Flutter and will be detectable using an independent strobe to check Speed.

I bought PF Encore TT and upgraded to Harmony MK2 with OL Enterprise mk4 tonearm. If you have PF table with Maestro controller, you must upgrade it to Conductor. The new speed controller is much more substantial not just in size, but performance as well. I can set perfect 33.3 & 45rpm! PF turntable is my first table so I can’t say much about comparing it to other tables, but with Enterprise tonearm, this analog setup is a beast. Sounds so exhilarating, natural, and refined. It was a bucket of money I spent but I think it performs well so I am happy.

It looks like a great table, but it seems a little disappointing that after spending so much, you would then need to buy an "upgraded" power supply. 

I considered getting the Pure Fidelity Harmony but after some thought I ended up getting the Luxman PD-151 Mark II. The tonearm isn't as robust but I prefer the changeable headshell and the attractive one box design.

@indelibo if you made that decision it mainly based on price because these two turntables are in completely different price classes and they couldn't be more different.