Schumann Resonator

@mahgister - I am glad you finally came around and are willing to admit it may be affecting you and not the sound. I have no opinion, I only beleive in FACTS.

@sbayne  - you are a helluva researcher. How many of those articles talk about SG effects on a stereo system versus the human body?

Until someone can show me one of the 2 following things, I will surmise that SGs may effect some people physiologically, but NOT audible sound before it hits your ear and enters your brain:

1) A single professional audio consultant who designs concert venues, move theaters, recording studios, home theaters, stereo store demonstration rooms or home audio rooms who uses SGs. These guys charge by the hour, not the equipment, so they would MAKE money by increasing time spent having to worry about where to place these things and don't.

2) A measured microphone input signal from a listening position with and without SGs from a record or CD at a constant volume from a stereo system. Not pink noise. Not decibel meters that measure inaudible waves like those the SGs generate. Real audible sound, corresponding frequencies and volume (amplitudes).

I won't respond again until someone shows me one of these 2 things. This repetition is exhausting.....seems like Monty Python's "The Argument" and time's up!

Everything makes a difference
Change the position of one thing in your room and it makes a change in compressive and shear wave interaction and the air that surrounds these objects. They move ever so slightly between other objects and so does the air. Oh I hear a difference Oh I just moved something . Tom

@mahgister - I am glad you finally came around and are willing to admit it may be affecting you and not the sound. I have no opinion, I only beleive in FACTS.

did you read my post?

i NEVER exclude that the S.G. could act on my body/brain/ears but i devise an experiment to prove to ALL that it cannot work ONLY on the body and brain, but also physically in the room and on the audio field...

Put a shungite piece on top of it... result: compression of the sounds

After that try an Herkimer diamond , results : decompression of the sounds..

After that put the 2 together, results: a balanced more positive effect..

I experiments with 30 minerals for 2 years in line EACH day....

I have no opinion, I only beleive in FACTS.

You believe in facts you read about, me too.... But i believe MORE in the facts i experiment with....This is the difference between your post questionning and my last answer....












I know what i know...

I dont buy hype in audio thread...I dont sell products... I dont review products..

I sell CREATIVITY.....peanuts costs....

Contrary to what said all audiophile threads, audiophile experience MAY cost only peanuts if someone know how to improve a bit all the 3 working embeddings dimensions of his audio system..

I apologize to repeat this but i am the only ONE affirming this truth....And this truth MUST be said.... This is an helping and hopeful one for all those who cannot afford costly gear but who want to improve their system with the curiosity to experiment...

My system is not the best there is but i did not have any frustration left and many 7 figures systems sound less musically than mine.... Then........Upgrading even with the best gear is not the way, working with the controls embeddings is the way....Especially with costly systems....

If not why a costly system could produce harshness and fatigue and being less natural in timbre perception? It is not the engineereing design of the gear the problem, it is the defects in the 3 workings embeddings....

 Mahgister..

Respectfully. You are not the only one who follows the need and sense to experiment. New materials and a sense for shapes that augment the sound not to make it chaotic and unpleasant are chief components of my product designs all thru my audio room and sound system. A lifelong expression. Tom

Trust me; they sound much better after the recommended 10,000 hour burn-in.