the notion that perception needs language to exist "adequately" (whatever that means) is, I think, a wrongful importation of the conceptual into something which is, if not completely pre-conceptual, at least pre-linguistic.Reality is Alas! not a caricature...
Gut feeling and language are not dualities between which we must choose like between two competitive masters...
The integrality of ANY human experience ask for feeling and concept at the same times...
In acoustic experimewnts and experience it is evident like in human relations...
And the stories people are telling here about non-audiophiles speaks volumes for their fully adequate perceptions *regardless* of their ability to express or describe them.The fact that my wife who think that my audio journey is an obsession is able to detect a positive change sometimes is absolutely not the proof that she could use her accurate feeling about sound for the sole guide.... She will not go very far with only his gut feeling.... Like most people walking blind already but pleased between different "upgrades" or "tweaks"....They called acoustical experience a "taste".... But acoustic is a science not a "taste"....To go passing a certain stage we need concepts to experiment, the ears opening itself to much more than to our own taste,but to acoustical new dimensions...