Mahgister, an anecdote dose not a study make.My intention was not a study....
Only to gives a personal anecdote that has some meaning attached to it... Perhaps do you know Vernadsky? It is no more an anecdote in my post.... One of the greatest Russian scientist...
For the study of cooperation of organisms in the long run we had plenty of studies; these facts dont eliminate struggle for life, and in human society the battle of all against all, but that relativize the phenomenon pointing to a more deep fact in the long run: cooperation...
Than in human society trust is the ONLY money, thinking otherwise is limited brain power or the results of past traumas or the two....Pick your choices...
History go to the " utopia" of self destruction or the opposite , there is no mid-way between these 2... Why? Because it is cooperation or death.... Simple ....Earth cannot manage 8 billions liars...
Humans will lie unless it is their own best interest not to.
You just say a few second ago that anecdote dont constitue a study.... And my anecdote has 12,000 anecdotes like yours...There are story and story... It is like your opinion of a "tweak" and many consumers satisfied opinions, there is a DIFFERENCE in the weight of anecdotes... Doctor must know this day by day...It is called a prognostic...
Anyway you are old enough to understand that those who always lies like your cop are those and the same who put themselves in the conditions where lying is a life style...
Average people dont lie at this scale and dont place themselves in the conditions where lies will be necessary and a life style...
If you go to bed with another woman you will be in the obligation to lie, not because you are a liar, because there is no other way.... Simple...
«Thinking is not only addition, it is division too, and few other things»-Groucho Marx