2. music
  3. 1069285520

SACD Source recording

Some recently acquired SACD are sounding better...maybe they are learning how to make them.

I can recommend DG 474 639-2 Bach Violin Concertos, Hilary Hahn. As I listened to it, and appreciated the excellent sonics, I perused the liner notes, and there in black and white is something that I had heard mentioned before. The source recording for this DSD disc is identified as 24-bit PCM. Of course this is just like a DVD-A, except that with the DVD-A one extra conversion to DSD is avoided. I bet that most SACD have been mastered on 24-bit PCM equipment, but not every disc manufacturer is up front about it.

I have no complaints about the sound, but I think that Sony and the SACD crowd should tone down the hype about DSD, and recognize DVD-A as equal.
eldartford
guss2
50 posts
 
I'm with Tireguy. I own 2 very good players(1 DVD-Audio and 1 SACD), and I much prefer SACD. I just don't get into the whole multi-channel music thing. I'm not saying that I won't, but it is just not for me at this time. I do like DVD-Audio in stereo and do agree that it beats Redbook easily, but it is not musical the way SACD is to me. So don't tell me I have to agree with you, because I don't. Gary.
eldartford OP
4,262 posts
 
"SACD croud"...I really didn't want to get another SACD vs DVD-A contest going. If you think SACD sounds better that's your opinion. In my opinion the differences are mainly due to how the particular discs were made, and your discs may very well favor SACD. Mine have favored DVD-A, but there are enough good SACD in my collection to indicate that this is a disc-by-disc thing.

My point is that if SACD sounds better, it can't be because 24-bit 96KHz PCM code is deficient, because many SACD have been through that format on their way to your player.
imin2u
392 posts
 
Nothing beats the Beck SACD "Sea Change" in the acoustic pop category. All rock on DVD-A is mushey in comparision. No vote on classical yet but Orff is kicking butt.
guss2
50 posts
 
That's right, it is my opinion. I guess I'm part of the SACD crowd because I prefer it to DVD-Audio, but I certainly would'nt ask you to recognize SACD as being equal to DVD-Audio, would I? That would be much too presumptuous of me. For the record, I prefer pure DSD recordings to all others. Most of my best SACD's are classical(Telarc), but I agree with Imin2u about Beck's "Sea Change", it's excellent. I really wish we could get more 24 bit 192Khz recordings on DVD-Audio, because I'm not set up for multi-channel and I want the best they can give in stereo. Gary.
eldartford OP
4,262 posts
 
Guss2...Boy! It doesn't take much to set the SACDS crowd off! All I said is that a SACD which is made from a 24-Bit 96KHz master cannot be superior to a DVD-A except with respect to differences in the way a particular disk is mastered and the quality of the player used.

"Pure" DSD recordings are not common, and there is a lot of 24-bit mastering equipment out there which record companies are not going to scrap any time soon.
More to discover