Why the limit on warranty to subsequent purchasor?


I have been looking into picking up a used high end CD player but I am finding that warranties are not transferrable from the original owner? I don't understand this. Maybe on a $500 unit, but a $5000 unit with no transferrable warranty, it makes me want to run from that manufacturer.
sm121055
I understand some of the reasoning but as you start increasing the price, other industries allow transferring the warranty. The transfering of the warranty allows people to try a product at a price they can afford. Can you imagine buying a 1 year old Corvette and Chevy says sorry, you have no warranty on that engine. This helps a manufacturer to develop brand loyalty and when the individual can affort to buy new, that brand is on the top of the list.
If I bought a Krell KAV piece with a transferrable warranty, I'd consider the warranty to be an integral part of the purchase. Now that Krell (and others) have "retroactively" dropped their transferrable warranty, I do believe someone will eventually sue over this.
This hobby is like our little private world. This is our version of politics......

It's Miller Time!
It is patently absurd to suggest that the manufacturers are being greedy by not transfering a warranty!
What responsibility does a company have to an individual with whom they have no relationship???
If I sell a piece of gear to another AudiogoNer with the understanding that it will work perfectly, and the buyer in turn sells it to another party. If that product fails do I have a responsibility to the second buyer???
These opinions are typical of the 'welfare' mentality of this country. A person gives not one penny to the manufacturer but expects the manufacturer to loose his own money by perpetually repairing the unit. Will all of us 'hi-enders' be happy when all the manufacturers go out of business, but offer unlimited warranties???
If you want a warranty, buy from the manufacturer or his representative (the retailers).
Again, I say this as a buyer who uses 100% used gear (except for a few cables). I am also a small business owner so I guess that makes me part of the enemy.
Nrchy: I am also a small business owner ( non audio related ) and offer a lifetime warranty on all of the equipment that i sell or service, regardless of who owns said product. I am the only one in my field in the USA that offers such a warranty and i know for certain that this warranty brings a large quantity of business my way. How i know this is that I have never done ANY advertising of ANY type. All of my work comes via word of mouth reference and that is it. As such, i know that offering high quality products / labor combined with an unbeatable warranty can only inspire confidence in customers to recommend me to other potential customers. At the same time, i know that the products that i have sold and / or serviced carry a higher value on the used market due to the fact that the warranty that i offer is transferable.

The point to all of this is that, if the product is well built to begin with and the work is properly performed, the company offering the warranty has nothing to fear. If the product is only offered with a warranty to the original purchaser, the manufacturer is actually warrantying the relationship with the purchaser for that period of time and not the actual product itself. This obviously lowers the confidence level in that product and the resale value that goes with it.

Having said the above, a manufacturer or repair facility would have to be certain that they built a product and / or performed labor that was up to the standards that such a warranty brings with it. This would mean weeding out less than reliable parts / circuitry, ruggedizing construction and maintaining good quality control of labor. As such, i am relatively selective as to what products i sell and offer the above warranty on when performing repairs / modifications to gear that i didn't sell. If i wasn't selective, i would lose my shirt giving away free labor for repairs on products that are built / designed like junk.

I would think that ANY manufacturer / dealer would want to do much the same thing. That is, if they wanted to be both successful and reputable. Like any other industry though, there are products that one can have faith in and others that should not have been manufactured to begin with. As such, i am up-front with my customers / potential customers as to what products qualify or don't qualify. From the information that i provide, they can decide whether or not they want to invest their money into buying that brand as a new item or if hanging onto or repairing a given product is a worthwhile venture. This is the same type of treatment that i look for when dealing with manufacturers and dealers of audio equipment. Even with their input though, only i know my personal tastes and the value that i place on each individual piece of equipment.

Obviously, companies / individuals that are willing to stand behind their products / labor are rare things in the audio industry. As such, i applaud those that do have the pride and conviction to build a product that they have unconditional faith in and will stand behind. Whether or not one likes or prefers those products is a different matter, but one can not deny the amount of respect that such a valiant stance deserves. Sean
>