Mr Tennis - I have the Maggie 3.6R's and have found ( after much experimentation, I might add) that you want to go with a sealed box sub, otherwise the bass lags behind the planar midrange too much. I use the Revel B12 Concerta with a short all silver(for speed) sub cable. My speaker cables/interconnects to the amps are a combioned 14 ft, so this also helps with the "speed" issue. The Concerta B12 is perfect with the planars and I would think one would do it for you. I am in a large room, so I needed two of them. The price is right as well - at $995.oo, these are VERY good subs, with a parametric equalizer as a bonus. I have heard teh Rels work as well, but I can tell you that the Hsu Research subs do not blend in well with the planars - I tried a VTF3 and it was WAY too slow. I hope this helps. John
magnepan 1.6 needs help in the bass
i'm begiinning to believe that the amgnepan 1.6 needs some assistance in the bass, i.e., more extension.
i am concerned that mating a cone, especially ported or sealed box is a problem as far as maintaining overall coherency.
also, it may be necessary to have stereo rather than mono sub, which can get expensive.
i have thought about rel, hsu and kharma ?
i also thought about the best way to configure the sub, namely blending. i would run the 1.6s full range and then add bass up to say 60 hz.
any thoughts ?
i am concerned that mating a cone, especially ported or sealed box is a problem as far as maintaining overall coherency.
also, it may be necessary to have stereo rather than mono sub, which can get expensive.
i have thought about rel, hsu and kharma ?
i also thought about the best way to configure the sub, namely blending. i would run the 1.6s full range and then add bass up to say 60 hz.
any thoughts ?
- ...
- 19 posts total
- 19 posts total