Why are we so passive?


In high-end audio the passive speaker is the norm. Active speakers may not be rare, but are definitely uncommon. What's the buzz on active?

Is active just another marketing scheme?
Is there really any difference between active and passive?
Why don't more audiophiles go active?
Why don't more manufacturers produce active speakers?
At what price point, if any, would you consider going active?
ojgalli
active is always better (foolproof), but since the object is to buy and fondle and resell, active speakers are not popular. in professional circles, it rules.
Mrtennis: There have been active panel (ELS) speakers in the past and there's no reason why there should not be.

Tarsando: They may not be the best amplifier makers but they can be and they can certainly collaborate or OEM the amps from others.

Jaybo: Agreed.
Using a monoblock close to the speaker gives you the choice of amps and speakers. Much the same advantage. I always wondered about having an amplifier exposed to such high energy vibrations in the cabinet, but then I worry and think too much about audio anyway! I like the flexibility and have the room to have both.
Very few are that good, and the ones that are cost way more than most would enter into vs. buying a good 2000 to 5000 dollar amp seperate, and a pair of 6000 dollar speakers..= 11 k vs 15 grand plus pair of ATC's and have to run power cords, interconnects etc.. all over the room.. Not to say this is not fine, cause I would say many actives at the same price points of fine passives would be just as good, just not as conveinent and or normal to the standard thinking audio guy. So like anything else somebodys gotta take a back seat to the norm. even if in ways its superior.