Watching Volvo owners defend Volvos is almost as funny as watching Bose owner's on TV. I say "The new Accord is the size of a 5 series -and starts at $20k. ", and the response is "Civic - Funny, that looks nothing like a 5 series, maybe your confusing years. Huh? Was that difficult to follow or
.?
Look, Volvos are a cliché for tree huggers and academics who dont know any better, or status seekers who can't afford Mercedes. Its advertising hype.
OK, according to LATEST NHTA tests (not 1984 or whenever), Toyota, Honda, Nissan, Hyundai and even Kia (!) score higher than Volvo as far as safety. Now safety is what Volvo is all about, RIGHT?
Just wait until you go into a sharp curve at 80 mph and you will notice the difference between a Volvo and a Honda! OK, from Motor trend Oct 2007 on the C30 (a minified C40)
Volvos newest car is more for designers than drivers
. I dont get the sense Im in a fun car
its a shame the driving dynamics clash with the stunning looks
the engine doesnt feel or sound refined, reminds me of a kitchen appliance
doesnt make you want to go quickly
universally trashed was the action of the gearbox and clutch
.light and imprecise, and she was being kind
possibly the worst six speed transmission on sale in the US today
numb steering and softness of the suspicion excessive body roll and lack of feeling.
80mph in a Volvo - you first. Try an Accord V6 at 80, or a Camry Sport (4 or V6) at 80 and youll rethink that statement quickly. Oh, and I assume youre not including the coupe versions, or the NSX of course.
Look, you guys drank the Kool Aid and that's OK, but next time you want to go apoplectic about Volvo's, get out of the 80s and realize its time is long past. One look at resale value should make that obvious.
Stick to audio equipment guys. Automobiles are obviously not a strong point.
You're welcome to have the final word Albert.