****Should / does the name and music have any relationship? Should a person be able to hear and follow the theme or subject indicated by the name?****
Should? Grandma used to tell me: "there are no "shoulds" in life". In seriousness, should the name of the music....? Probably not, although I think it's much better when it does and I think the best tunes do.
Does? Often it does. 1. Sometimes it's obvious and the music follows, as you say, the theme indicated by the name. 2. Other times it's a very "inside" relationship that only the composer of the tune is privy to; and, may want to keep it that way. 3. Sometimes there's no relationship whatsoever and the title is random or may relate to a person or event without the music itself relating to that person or event; I think this is the exception.
1. Obvious:
- "Take Five". The tune is in 5/4; five beats to the measure.
- "Watermelon Man". HEEEEEEEEEY WATERMELON MAN
- "So What". Eight note bass lick followed by the two note motif by the horns: SO WHAT!
- "Ceora". First three notes of the tune are clearly deliniating the three syllables of the title.
- "Take The A Train". YOU, MUST TAKE THE A TRAIN
- "Salt Peanuts". SALT PEANUTS, SALT PEANUTS
2. Inside
Well, if it weren't an inside thing we would know, right?
3.
- "Ornithology". No clues in the music itself, but since the word means the study of birds.....duh! "Bird", get it?
- "Bitches Brew". Couldn't imagine the connection.
- "Billy's Bounce". Obviously relates to Billy (?), but I don't hear it in the music itself
Often, a composer has an experience or sees somehting that has some kind of impact as in the case of "Watermelon Man". I heard Herbie Hancock describe that very process in how he wrote the tune; he saw a man selling watermelons. Fewer times the composer writes a tune and then "looks" for a title that he feels somehow relates or chooses to leave the choice of title completely random.
BTW, I think your overall assessment of Thomas is spot on.
Should? Grandma used to tell me: "there are no "shoulds" in life". In seriousness, should the name of the music....? Probably not, although I think it's much better when it does and I think the best tunes do.
Does? Often it does. 1. Sometimes it's obvious and the music follows, as you say, the theme indicated by the name. 2. Other times it's a very "inside" relationship that only the composer of the tune is privy to; and, may want to keep it that way. 3. Sometimes there's no relationship whatsoever and the title is random or may relate to a person or event without the music itself relating to that person or event; I think this is the exception.
1. Obvious:
- "Take Five". The tune is in 5/4; five beats to the measure.
- "Watermelon Man". HEEEEEEEEEY WATERMELON MAN
- "So What". Eight note bass lick followed by the two note motif by the horns: SO WHAT!
- "Ceora". First three notes of the tune are clearly deliniating the three syllables of the title.
- "Take The A Train". YOU, MUST TAKE THE A TRAIN
- "Salt Peanuts". SALT PEANUTS, SALT PEANUTS
2. Inside
Well, if it weren't an inside thing we would know, right?
3.
- "Ornithology". No clues in the music itself, but since the word means the study of birds.....duh! "Bird", get it?
- "Bitches Brew". Couldn't imagine the connection.
- "Billy's Bounce". Obviously relates to Billy (?), but I don't hear it in the music itself
Often, a composer has an experience or sees somehting that has some kind of impact as in the case of "Watermelon Man". I heard Herbie Hancock describe that very process in how he wrote the tune; he saw a man selling watermelons. Fewer times the composer writes a tune and then "looks" for a title that he feels somehow relates or chooses to leave the choice of title completely random.
BTW, I think your overall assessment of Thomas is spot on.