Is Maggie 20.1 still overall better than 3.7?

Hi Folks, is Maggie 20.1 (or even the older version, 20) still overall better than 3.7(i)?

Second question: are the 20.7s on a totally another level compared with 20.1s?

mtoc04-01-2016 4:02pm

...
23 posts total
View entire discussion

sbank Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 3,378 posts 04-04-2016 at 04:11pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete Perhaps 3.7s mated with subs is the ticket? Recently heard 20.7 with REL subs, pretty great. Cheers, Spencer
don_c55 Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 1,025 posts 04-04-2016 at 08:19pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete Subs NEVER mate perfectly with planars. The sonic transition from panel to cone is always heard IMO!
bdp24 Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 9,510 posts 04-05-2016 at 02:36am Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete That's how I felt Don. So I bought a pair of Magneplanar Tympani T-IV's to use as (sub)woofers for my Quad 57's (I had a big room ;-). Then I got a pair of the OB/Dipole Subs from GR Research. Wanna buy a pair of Tympani IV's? I don't need 'em anymore!
sbank Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 3,378 posts 04-05-2016 at 05:20pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete Don, I also used to agree w/your statement, but newer JL and REL subs have opened my eyes (ears?). Cheers, Spencer
dave_b Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 3,159 posts 04-06-2016 at 12:21am Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete They cheapened the Maggie's and took away the easy tweets one could do with the outboard XO !! Less bass is never good no matter how hard someone may try to convince you. Parts are crap now as well...I've moved on!

23 posts total
View entire discussion

More to discover