Magnetic isolation

I´m talking only about heavy turntables. ( I have never liked CD´s dull and edgy sound so I have no idea whether maglev feet would be benefit for digital too).
There is a clear sonic benefit between say 10 mm and 2 mm separate. The narrower the gap between magnets the better sonics, IME.

Anyone tried maglev feet with speakers ?

harold-not-the-barrel
297 posts
06-29-2016 12:06pm
"I´m talking only about heavy turntables. ( I have never liked CD´s dull and edgy sound so I have no idea whether maglev feet would be benefit for digital too).

There is a clear sonic benefit between say 10 mm and 2 mm separate. The narrower the gap between magnets the better sonics, IME."

Your last statement directly conflicts with your earlier statement that more powerful magnets improve sound quality. Am I missing something? It sounds like you are now agreeing with me, that the opposing magnets need to be just powerful enough to produce a gap, but not more powerful for a given load.

geoff kait
machina dynamica
isolation vibration and resonance control

Fec,

You've peaked my interest.  What magnetic levitation product are you using?   I'd like to read up on it.

Geoff, my statements don´t conflict (maybe a little typo though ?).
Try this: A heavy deck needs strong magnets but not TOO strong. Then gap between deck and feet becomes too long resulting weaker magnetic field and thus more unstable balance. The essence is dense magnetic field between deck and feet, as dense as possible in fact.
2 mm gap gives denser magnetic field. 

The more dense magnetic field results to stronger magnetic force and thus better stability. The magnetic push needs to be just enough. That´s the trick :)

Indeed, a dense magnetic field utilizing magnets that are suitable for the load.
I think the gap I have is about 2 - 3mm.