2. speakers
  3. 1223044851

Ohm Walsh Micro Talls: who's actually heard 'em?

Hi,

I'd love to hear the impressions of people who've actually spent some time with these speakers to share their sense of their plusses and minuses. Mapman here on Audiogon is a big fan, and has shared lots on them, but I'm wondering who else might be familiar with them.
rebbi
frazeur1
345 posts
 
Hah, nice one Map!
bondmanp
1,811 posts
 

Mapman - I saw Hillary there, too.  She was buying a big pair of Magicos for some guy named Comey. ;-)


Too bad about the Stereophile writer (Steve Guttenberg?  I saw him there on Sunday).  I wish one of the magazines would take a fresh look at Ohm's current designs.

mapman's avatar
mapman
22,198 posts
 
Maybe a public presence at shows will lead to that.

Those magazines, though.   Some seriously believe those are kinda rigged.   Money talks that's for sure.
mapman's avatar
mapman
22,198 posts
 
Seriously I'd love to hear The Clinton's and Trumps systems.   Who does that better?  Inquiring minds want to know.  :)
accurus
40 posts
 
Here is a link to the coverage Stereophile gave the Ohms.
http://www.stereophile.com/content/nyas-2016-day-one-jim-austin#32si0iLbhryvqxkY.97

I wasn't there to have a listen, but I have to say that I have never heard the "abundance of ambience" that he was talking about. One comment that did strike me and I wish reviewers would learn to acknowledge and identify their own listening bias is that laser sharp imaging that so many seem to want in hifi today that is not what "real" music sounds like.

Laser sharp imaging is an artifact of stereo speakers and is a design choice and not a sign of quality or increased desirability. I have seen folks slight Magnepans before for a lack for a lack of razor sharp imaging. Yet again if you look at Magnepan and Ohm's marketing material it is about recreating live music. Most speakers are not about recreating live music.
More to discover