****In regard to the "music critic" type of response; it might be appropriate in a music school or class, but comes off as condescending here,****
With all due respect, O-10, I think you left out two key words at the end of that statement....."to me". There is no condescension in expressing truth and points of interest expressed without condescension in the context of a discussion about music; condescension of the type as in the "dissect it like a frog" comment.
Hey, speaking of condescension:
****I'm sure those of us who simply listen without analyzing, enjoy the music more than the analytical critic****
Absolutely not true; but, if you need to feel that you enjoy music more than I do, please, by all means do so its cool with me.
As far as commentary that not only is unsubstantiated, but that is more suitable for a classroom:
****"Enigma" is the most creative musical group to come along in decades; they have presented a new form of artistic expression with mystic and experimental components which enabled them to sell 700 million records world wide.
Their music fits all the various definitions of the word in regard to "genre"; therefor it is music of the world without any specific definition, or genre, although we demand that all things be classified.****
Ahem!