Jazz for aficionados


Jazz for aficionados

I'm going to review records in my collection, and you'll be able to decide if they're worthy of your collection. These records are what I consider "must haves" for any jazz aficionado, and would be found in their collections. I wont review any record that's not on CD, nor will I review any record if the CD is markedly inferior. Fortunately, I only found 1 case where the CD was markedly inferior to the record.

Our first album is "Moanin" by Art Blakey and The Jazz Messengers. We have Lee Morgan , trumpet; Benney Golson, tenor sax; Bobby Timmons, piano; Jymie merrit, bass; Art Blakey, drums.

The title tune "Moanin" is by Bobby Timmons, it conveys the emotion of the title like no other tune I've ever heard, even better than any words could ever convey. This music pictures a person whose down to his last nickel, and all he can do is "moan".

"Along Came Betty" is a tune by Benny Golson, it reminds me of a Betty I once knew. She was gorgeous with a jazzy personality, and she moved smooth and easy, just like this tune. Somebody find me a time machine! Maybe you knew a Betty.

While the rest of the music is just fine, those are my favorite tunes. Why don't you share your, "must have" jazz albums with us.

Enjoy the music.
orpheus10
Hello again, O.  I did appreciate your concern that I might have been offended by your earlier comments about Eldar's take on "Moanin'".  
I was not offended and my subsequent comments really weren't intended as a defense of my "unique" point of view.  On a good day, I can consider  various conflicting points of view and learn from them.  Though somewhat critical, these broaden my appreciation of his performance strengths and weaknesses. 

Now, as far as me not being as grounded in jazz and therefore not having expectations and these couple of factors leading to a comparison to the blind guys groping the elephant - that does warrant some further discussion.  Am I the only blind guy you had in mind?  If so, that certainly smacks of someone taking an objectivist stance on jazz appreciation:  "I'm better informed.  I've cultivated better taste.  My long years of listening enable me to recognize good jazz vs bad jazz.  You, on the other hand, aren't well enough schooled to distinguish between the two."  That's a position I can accept.  Might or might not apply in this case.  BUT it seems to run counter to your usual subjectivist stance.  

Art history is a sequence of new styles being declared barbaric by proponents of "the old school".  Can being enamored of and married to a particular style blind one (deafen one, in this case) to the merit of other styles?  I think that's a risk.  Blindness or deafness afflicts all of us to some extent.  As much as you, Rok and Wynton seem to wish it were so, jazz cannot be frozen and preserved in exactly the same forms as found over the span of a few decades.  Its beauty and strength is how alive and constantly changing it is as a medium of expression - even if I can't always "go there" or appreciate the latest frontier.  

I actually think I have a clue what you object to in that rendition of "Moanin'.  [Aside from style violating one's sensibilities and expectations, how much moanin' has Eldar ever really had occasion to do, anyway?  'It ain't "authentic.' someone I know would say.]  To me, the original intent behind "Moanin" as a touchstone for evaluating the Eldar piece is just not relevant.  I certainly get that it matters to you but for me, that background is a minor footnote.  I'm really not trying to insult you or belittle something you treasure.  It goes back to what you said about our appreciation being shaped by so many different "life-experience" variables.  In this case, I'm guessing we share very little around that piece.  

Playing that Eldar album again as I write.  It's just amazing to me.  There are sections where it sounds like four hands playing not two!   My appreciation of him is definitely not "unique" (though my reasons might be.  I don't know).  I have read that he's something of a pop culture "darling" (appearing on various late night TV shows).  That, to me, is probably more damning than anything you or Frogman have said.  I'll try to forget I read that and just focus on his wonderful playing.  Anyone who can take "Nature Boy" or "Fly Me to the Moon" and make them interesting to me is doing something remarkable in my O-pinion.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=db7n1kNkFk8&ab_channel=EldarDjangirov-Topic

Ghosthouse, "Moanin" is what it is, and that will never change, although there are many ways to reach the end result of what the tune is about, or just play it any way the artist wants to, but the original intention of the tune will never change. Maybe if the name was changed to "Moanin" modified it would be acceptable.

If you like the music, that's fine, but it doesn't change anything in regard to the "original" tune and intended meaning by Bobby Timmons.

In regard to the blind guys, there was only one elephant, yet each came to his own conclusion; such is the way of three different sighted individuals looking at anything, or listening to jazz. While most of jazz is abstract, Moanin is most specific.


Enjoy the music.

Ghosthouse, I don't know anything about ballet, but from what I can gather "Swan Lake" doesn't have a lot of latitude for variation, and there are certain elements that constitute a perfect "Swan Lake". Although there are no written rules for jazz standards, there are unwritten rules that the vast majority of jazz artists adhere to. At the same time it's possible to like a tune that has broken all the rules.

If you know something about ballet, and "Swan Lake" specifically, how would you compare that to "the jazz standards"?


Enjoy the music.
**** Although there are no written rules for jazz standards, there are unwritten rules that the vast majority of jazz artists adhere to. ****

O-10, could you please explain what some of those "unwritten rules" are?  And how they relate to the "Moanin'" in question?  Thanks.

**** Frogman, why don't you just write my posts for me? Why is it that no one misinterprets every word I write like you? ****

Likewise, O-10, please explain what exactly it is that I have misinterpreted?  I don't believe I have, but would like to know what you meant that I am not understanding.  Thanks.  Btw, I take PayPal......just kidding, O-10.....can't have too much charm ☺️





Frogman, you have mentioned the unwritten rules many times, but now you don't know them; sorry, I can't help you.


I posted this at 2:36 PM today in order to change the subject, but nobody noticed it.

         
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VVB18xbRMI4&list=PL0z5a235GY1awuZeBQBO6ZWQfg95Gkg5N


Apparently we would rather go around the Christmas tree than enjoy it.