Old Amp vs. New Amp


Hi All!

I'm in search of a new amplifier and I am looking at new amps as well as older used amps.  There is some really great older gear out there for very reasonable prices, and of course the new stuff is considerably more expensive.

Is newer stuff really any better than some of the great older gear from the 90's and early 00's?

Opinions?
petrela
stereo5977 posts02-15-2017 8:14amIMHO, Class D is not yet ready for prime time.
+1
Not until technology advances enough for the switching frequency of Class-D to be at least >5 x higher, then their switching noise output filters can do their job without any detrimental effects on the audio band.

Cheers George
Class D to me feels like one of those things that makes it cheaper, easier and faster to manufacture, but may be lacking in "listening pleasure".  But I have not heard any of the newer "High End" class D offerings.

I know PS Audio Stellar line uses some sort of hybrid of Class D technology.  I would be curious to compare those to other high end products.
Also, some manufacturers like SMc Audio (McCormack), Atma-Sphere (tubes)and Ayre update their older models. So, you wouldn't have to worry about not being able to get either repairs or getting the most up to date version.
Regarding cables, it would simplify a lot if you went with balanced connections which aren't as fussy as RCA. Even an inexpensive cable will give you plenty of dynamics.
Class D amps intrigue me, but it seems the jury is out. Some swear by them, other less so. Though the prices are attractive.
Bob
I'm kinda partial to the big old tanks myself.  They look like beasts because they are!

A 10 lb amp that sits 2" high just doesn't look very imposing.
I do plan on using balanced cables.  I have heard a lot of good things about those, and my preamp supports them.