XLR interconnects


I read that XLR interconnects can maintain the signal over longer distances therefore it is ideal to use an XLR interconnect over rca unbalanced cables. Why then do you see cable manufacture companies produce 0.5 m, 1m, 2m, 3m interconnects for audio gear? What is difference over a 1m, 2m, 3m rca unbalanced cable? Is there any sound differences?

2007audioman
2007audioman
The Rotel RSP 1582 has XLR inputs and outputs but it's not really balanced unless you have very "noisy" environment I really don't think the XLR cable will make any difference. 
" The Rotel RSP 1582 has XLR inputs and outputs but it's not really balanced unless you have very "noisy" environment I really don't think the XLR cable will make any difference. "

Having a noisy environment doesn't determine if a component is balanced or not, but I think I know what you are trying to say. I've had several Rotel components over the years and they all had xlr connectors but were single ended. I was kind of surprised when I checked the specs on the 1582, because it looks like it is, in fact, truly balanced, but not fully balanced. I got this info from Rotel's website.

Input SensitivityLine Level Inputs (RCA): 250mVLine Level Inputs (XLR): 500mVPhono Input (MM): 3.2mV

Preout LevelUnbalanced (RCA): 1VBalanced (XLR): 2V

Input ImpedanceLine Level Inputs (RCA): 100kΩLine Level Inputs (XLR): 100kΩPhono Input (MM): 47kΩ

NOTE: Do not connect both the RCA and XLR to the same amplifier at the same time.

2 different specs for input sensitivity and output level, but none for input impedance, along with the note about the outputs, would suggest the 1582 balances the signal on the output.

2007audioman

It looks like the Rotel is truly balanced on the output. What that means is the signal is converted to balanced right before it gets sent to the amp. For a component to be fully balanced/differential, they have to double up on all the components in the signal path, and its very costly to do so. Even more so because its a HT preamp with a bunch of extra channels. Also, a component can't be run balanced and SE at the same time. There has to be some type of switch.

What all this means for you, is that you really don't need to be concerned with any of your source components. There should be no difference between rca and xlr. Going from your preamp to power amps, maybe. If you need to run long cables to your amps, you may hear a bit of improvement with balanced cables. (But only if your amps are truly or fully balanced as well). My personal view on this is you should buy the Rotel even though its not fully balanced. If I was looking for a HT preamp in that price range, I would buy it without hesitation.
Hi sfall
Thanks for your comments and looking up the specs on the RSP 1582. I will be picking up the RSP 1582 in the near future. I have no plans on adding Dolby Atmos and DTS: X at this time and will just build a 7.1 setup instead. I may wait to decide which cable I should get although my dealer is offering me a nice deal for the unbalanced Audioquest Water rca interconnect cables. The comments on here from other members is much appreciated for sure. I'm still on the fence about it but may just stick with unbalanced interconnects. One thing is I always have the option of converting these to XLR interconnects at anytime. 


2007audioman
" cable I should get although my dealer is offering me a nice deal for the unbalanced Audioquest Water rca interconnect cables. "

That's a good choice. It's pretty hard to screw up with AQ. They sound good in just about any system. And like your dealer said, they can be converted to balanced at any time. AQ puts 3 discreet solid core conductors in they're IC's, so it's easy to convert.
Aside from all the pro/con arguments both ways, I prefer the more "positive" locking connection an XLR makes