Tekton Double Impacts
I have dedicated audio room 14.5x20.5x9 ft. Currently have Marantz Reference CD/Intergrated paired to Magnepan 1.7's with REL T-7 subs. For the vast majority of music I love this system. The only nit pick is that it is lacking/limited in covering say below 35 hz or so. For the first time actually buzzed the panel with an organ sacd. Bummer. Thought of upgrading subs to rythmicks but then I will need to high pass the 1.7's. Really don't want to deal with that approach.
Enter the Double Impacts. Many interesting things here. Would certainly have a different set of strengths here. Dynamics, claimed bottom octave coverage in one package, suspect a good match to current electronics.
I've read all the threads here so we do not need to rehash that. Just wondering if others out there have FIRST HAND experience with these or other Tekton speakers
Thanks.
- ...
- 5692 posts total
Folks I’m still baffled as to how an octal small tube such as the 6SN7 has the capacity to successfully manage a legitimate full range speaker. How is this tube able to provide sufficient current for a 4 ohm impedance load? I believe the listening impressions of Teajay and Allan but this outcome is highly outside expectations given known specifications of both products. Fascinating results in my opinion. I’ve been a long time advocate for high quality lower power amplifiers ( particularly DHT SET types) and higher sensitivity and easy load efficient speakers. But! I must admit to being surprised by this unique scenario. Charles |
Charles1dad, if I were an EE maybe I could scratch the surface of explaining David Bernings designs but they are very complicated. These amps are unlike any other tube amp I have ever owned and they also seem more powerful than conventional tube amps. David Berning's ingenus impedance conversion tech is behind this. http://davidberning.com/technology |
Hi Charles,
Your question is of course a logical and very valid one. After thinking about it a little, I believe I can explain how the 1 watt MicroZOTL amp can drive the DI to levels in the vicinity of 100 db at the listening position. Three things need to be considered: Output impedance, current capability, and power capability. I’ll mention first that the amp is rated, somewhat counter-intuitively for a tube amp, to be able to deliver more power into 4 ohms (1 watt) than into a higher impedance (0.5 watts into 14 ohms). And its output impedance is specified as a usefully low 2 ohms. How is that possible with a 6SN7, which like just about any small signal tube operates under relatively high voltage/low current/high impedance conditions? The key to the answer is that the ZOTL amps are not true OTLs in the traditional sense. As I know you’ll recall from discussions in other threads here, between the output tube and the output terminals of the amp is a transformer that operates at RF (not audio) frequencies, as well as some solid state switching devices. That circuit converts the high voltage/low current/high impedance condition under which the tube operates to a much lower voltage/higher current/lower impedance condition, while presumably being efficient enough to not sacrifice a significant amount of power in the process. (For a resistive load power = voltage x current, and when a transformer transforms voltage and current the product of the two cannot increase, since it is a passive device). So that takes care of output impedance and current capability. Regarding the 1 watt power capability of the amp: The speaker is rated to produce an SPL of 98.82 db at 1 meter for an input of 2.83 volts. Let’s call it 99 db. 2.83 volts into 4 ohms corresponds to 2 watts. So the 99 db becomes 96 db for a 1 watt input. Assuming that falls off with increasing distance at a rate of 6 db per doubling of distance, which is typical for non-planar speakers, at a typical listening distance of say 10 or 12 feet the 96 db would be reduced to about 86 db. If both of the speakers that are present are supplied with 1 watt, the overall acoustic power that is radiated into the room would increase by 3 db, relative to the output of a single speaker, but the increase would approach 6 db if the listener is approximately centered. That brings us to 92 db. “Room gain,” i.e., the effects of reflected energy in the room, would conceivably add something like 3 db or so. That brings us to 95 db. And probably another few db would be added as a result of some combination of dynamic headroom, conservatism in the 1 watt spec, and a small amount of clipping that would not be perceivable as such. Voila! Best regards, -- Al |
- 5692 posts total