2. speakers
  3. 128578-80822

Tekton Double Impacts

Anybody out there heard these??

I have dedicated audio room 14.5x20.5x9 ft.  Currently have Marantz Reference CD/Intergrated paired to Magnepan 1.7's with REL T-7 subs.  For the vast majority of music I love this system.  The only nit pick is that it is lacking/limited in covering say below 35 hz or so.  For the first time actually buzzed the panel with an organ sacd. Bummer.  Thought of upgrading subs to rythmicks but then I will need to high pass the 1.7's.  Really don't want to deal with that approach.

Enter the Double Impacts.  Many interesting things here.  Would certainly have a different set of strengths here.  Dynamics, claimed bottom octave coverage in one package, suspect a good match to current electronics.

I've read all the threads here so we do not need to rehash that.  Just wondering if others out there have FIRST HAND experience with these or other Tekton speakers

Thanks.
corelli
mac48025's avatar
mac48025
672 posts
 
Corelli,

i forgot got to mention that three of my favorite places in Michigan are in GR.

Founders
Vintage Tube Services
Meijer Gardens

Next time I head out there I'll let you know.....maybe you could help me use up some of my Founders gift card :)
corelli OP
1,027 posts
 
Sounds good.  I've got the Meijer Garden covered with my annual membership.
charles1dad's avatar
charles1dad
10,250 posts
 
Hi Joe  (snopro),
It's good to see you posting and I  hope you are doing well. Are you still using the Frankenstein and the Hornings?
Charles 
mikirob
955 posts
 
Almarg,
As always thank you for the stellar explanations regarding the microZOTl driving the DI. This thread has really made me re-think what is possible. I've been a fanboy of Eric Alexander for some time now and still own the Tekton original Lore as well as Micro Lore which are very good speakers. Not long ago I also acquired my brother's DeVore 0/96 and Harbeth HL5's. Both are phenomenal speakers in their own right; but I think I must try the DI with the MicroZotl stuff. Best, mikirob
teajay
1,709 posts
 
Hey snopro,

I too have had virtually all the highly regarded 67SN7's in my collection, including the Sylvania 1950's bad boys, and for my taste I still greatly prefer the TungSol 1940's tube.  I fine them to the most natural/real sounding in their tone and unbelievably 3D in their imaging with an overall liquidity from top to bottom.

Yes, very expensive these days, but not over rated in my opinion.
More to discover