Jazz for aficionados


Jazz for aficionados

I'm going to review records in my collection, and you'll be able to decide if they're worthy of your collection. These records are what I consider "must haves" for any jazz aficionado, and would be found in their collections. I wont review any record that's not on CD, nor will I review any record if the CD is markedly inferior. Fortunately, I only found 1 case where the CD was markedly inferior to the record.

Our first album is "Moanin" by Art Blakey and The Jazz Messengers. We have Lee Morgan , trumpet; Benney Golson, tenor sax; Bobby Timmons, piano; Jymie merrit, bass; Art Blakey, drums.

The title tune "Moanin" is by Bobby Timmons, it conveys the emotion of the title like no other tune I've ever heard, even better than any words could ever convey. This music pictures a person whose down to his last nickel, and all he can do is "moan".

"Along Came Betty" is a tune by Benny Golson, it reminds me of a Betty I once knew. She was gorgeous with a jazzy personality, and she moved smooth and easy, just like this tune. Somebody find me a time machine! Maybe you knew a Betty.

While the rest of the music is just fine, those are my favorite tunes. Why don't you share your, "must have" jazz albums with us.

Enjoy the music.
orpheus10

Here's the album I have by Andrew Hill; the title is "Spiral", and it looks like I just walked out of the record store with it (no exaggeration).

I found it on the tube; I would appreciate some critical analysis.



        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ceQbpRWR1_0
It IS that obvious and just to be clear (I know you are) the differences are not about "better" or "worse". The discussion here re West Coast style started as a criticism of precisely the attitude expressed in some of the commentary I posted. It is unfortunate that the style as a whole was perceived that way by some. As far as I’m concerned Paul Desmond, as Pryso said, could swing as much as anybody. To extend the food analogy, anyone who tells you Italian cooking is "better" than Indian is being foolish, imo. Give "Out To Lunch" a whirl sometime.
Re "Spiral" and request for "critical analysis" that you can then pick apart (sort of) here's a novel idea:  How's about if instead of panning something and, by association, panning some other listener's appreciation of that something you offer SOMETHING ("analysis") of your own?  ....SOMETHING!

It's not about the color of one's skin, but the color of one's music; Pepper Adams skin might be white, but his music is "hard-bop" all the way. Check out his solo on Mingus's Moanin.


                      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=__OSyznVDOY




         
To my ears, whether something "swings" or not is not part of my sense of East Coast VS West Coast.  In general, East Coast is simply more blues based and has a harder beat.  When I was young and first getting into jazz at the end of the '50s and early '60s (yes frogman, I've got several years on you), the debate over the merits of each style was well underway.  For me, Brubeck, Mulligan/Baker, and others could certainly swing.  Maybe it was more the absence of that hard beat that contributed to the "cool" label?

Now I've lived on both coasts.  When you get within a mile or two of the Atlantic you can smell it (the sea air I mean, not backwater bilge).  However here by the Pacific I can be within a city block and not be so aware of it.  I don't know if the Atlantic is briner but in general the East Coast has higher humidity and I suspect that greater moisture in the air carries the salt smells.

I bring that up because it suggests other characteristics to me.  NYC is known to be loud, up front, in your face, while LA has the reputation to be laid back, relaxed, and yes, cool.  Whether those are fair characterizations or not, they have also been applied to the jazz associated with each.  The simplest difference may be that East Coast jazz tends to be more intense.

With all that, should I guess that Bruce Katz is from California?