So, a bit more of the story has been clarified. Given that the OP is NOT out money on the damage done to the ML, but had to spend a lot of time dealing with the problem, what does he expect from Kevin Deal? Does he expect Kevin to come to his place and rake leaves for the hours lost?
I can understand not being happy with the product. Even if it is a rare happenstance, if you are the unfortunate person, it is understandable that the brand is, for the victim of circumstances, anathema.
This sort of failure, whether it is caused by a bad lot of a certain part (this happens with the best of gear), or some kind of unexpected incompatibility, does not necessarily implicate the product as poorly designed or shoddily built.
It makes even less sense for someone to point to a single problem as evidence that products of a whole nation or region of the world should be avoided. When the Chinese build for a foreign company, the product is as well-built as is specified by the customer. The customer also specifies the parts used. The customer has some responsibility to oversee how their product is built. If the Chinese company does not live up to the bargain, it is the customer's responsibility to change manufacturer. Cheap build is what some buyers want, and what they get, but that is not the case with all Chinese gear. Note that China is FAR from being the lowest cost manufacturer these days; they compete because they can deliver what the buyer needs in many ways: ease of doing business, flexibility in making design changes, etc.