This getting ridiculous / a third Hi Def format


.
CEDIA: HD VMD to Make US Debut This Fall
Wed Sep 05, 2007 at 01:34 PM ET


The long-anticipated third high-def disc format (yes, you read right) is set to hit US shores this October.

Short for "Versatile Multilayer Disc," the VMD format was originally announced back in 2006, but had evaded US release until now.

Developed by UK technology company New Medium Enterprises (NME), the format's red laser multilayer disc is currently capable of storing 15 to 20 GB on a single layer, with plans to grow that number to 30GB.

But according to its manufacturer, the real sell of VMD is its ability to deliver the same high-quality video and audio as Blu-ray and HD DVD at a fraction of the cost -- both to the consumer, and the content creator.

While disc production costs for Blu-ray and HD DVD are said to run somewhere between $2 to $3 a unit, VMD discs reportedly cost just over a $1/unit to produce, only slightly more than standard-def DVD.

In terms of hardware cost to the consumer, NME says its first player will hit the US market in October at a $199 price point, roughly 30% less than any standalone high-def disc player currently available (although Venturer recently announced plans to release its own $199 1080i HD DVD player in time for the holidays).

Price aside, VMD is likely to face an uphill battle both for recognizable high-def content, and for shelf space at retailers.

The company's press release includes no mention of any US-based content partners, and it seems highly unlikely that any of the major studios will make their films available on VMD disc -- at least in the short term. (Overseas, the company has partnered with a number indie film distributors, most notably including Eastern Europe's Monolith Films which owns regional rights to films like 'Apocalypto,' 'Lord of War,' and '16 Blocks.')

On the retail side, so far NME has only identified one US retailer who will carry its players -- pcRUSH.com

NME is demonstrating its new player this week at the CEDIA Expo.
128x128mitch4t
I agree with Soix. Any new audio (hi rez) format needs to hang itself on video, because for most of the world, video is where it's at. It really is nothing but good news.
Soix, you wrote: "So, ipso facto, if JQ Public buys into these new formats the software will follow and hi-def music along with it."

That is a big IF. Who buys a player that has very little available software?

Which comes first the chicken (hardware) or the egg (software)?
Don_s -- I agree without the software it's a dead issue. But there are hi-def movies being released on a regular basis, and people who have either HD-DVD or Blu-ray players are raving about the images they're getting on their HD screens, so average consumers do recognize a significant benefit (unlike what happened with SACD and DVD-A where we audiophiles were the only ones who cared).

I would not bet against these new hi-rez DVD players, and as they get cheaper and more people get HD displays there's no way people won't adopt them. Heck, they even make their standard DVDs look better on their HD sets -- bonus. And as they find their way into more households and become the norm, the resistance of music companies to release hi-rez music to play on them will diminish. So I don't think there's any IF about it -- it's already happening. Unless you think movie studios aren't going to issue their product in HD or that music companies don't want to make more money and re-issue past releases in a hi-rez format along with new releases, this is a done deal. There's a ton of profit to be had here along with a clear and meaninful benefit to consumers, and that's the bottom line and why this will ultimately succeed.

By the way, I think it's LG that's manufacturing a multi-format player, not Samsung as I mentioned in my previous post.
Comparisons of hi-def DVD formats to DVD-A and SACD formats don't hold up because people notice visual improvements right away, and historically the buying public has largely embraced improvements in picture quality (and format convenience). Look how quickly DVD overtook VHS even though most people weren't taking advantage of the discrete digital soundtracks or using progressive scan. The DVD picture quality was still better and people liked that (and probably not having to rewind, the small size, etc.).

Also, look who's hawking HD televisions and disk players: the mass marketers. Go into a Circuit City, Best Buy, Wal-Mart, Sam's, or Costco and it's all you see. It's obvious to anyone that the picture from a Blu-ray or HD DVD player on a 1080p display is even better than what you get in a movie theater. The mass market has embraced it and is pushing it.

That was never true of SACD or DVD-A.