Looks like Tidal is doomed!

The last line attempts to focus on PR, but the article itself makes it plain there are serious financial issues involved. Being behind in royalty payments is recoverable, but this could also be a giant death spiral. 

What I like about Tidal is the vast catalog. Depending on how that was structured, this could be unsustainable. 

Best,

E

Have been following the streaming services and their royalty payments for some time because it seems to me that most services (and especially Spotify) do not charge nearly enough in monthlies to provide reasonable compensation to artists.
Naxos is offering a high end streaming service for classical music with a more realistic $32 a month or $315 a year. This is a move forward in my opinion because it promotes a realistic business model not based upon loss leading used to grab listeners then making up for the unrealistically low income in some other way later one.
The downward pressure from streaming on musicians has been devastating and has recently been described in depth by the NY Times and other publications. Streaming services and Internet users should consider the total economic model because if the design promotes poverty on the part of the participating artists then the artistic content will not last.
A separate issue is accountability and transparency. Who knows whether the service provides accurate totals and compensation? Programmers might develop tools to provide some security here.