I think the cerebral vs visceral/emotional listening experience/system it's an interesting question and SG is far from the first to bring it up. It's been an audiophile chestnut to kick around as long as I've been in the hobby.
I think most of us would recognize the phenomenon in ourselves. How many of us have found ourselves seemingly effortlessly engaged in music on our car stereo (even a not-so-great car stereo) sometimes in ways that seem to come with more difficulty from our main 2 channel systems?
That kind of thing.
The problem is, what amounts to a more "visceral/emotional" system vs cerebral tends to vary among audiophiles. One will feel only an old school British monitor will get them into the music and make them "forget" about analysis, others will say they need much more impact and aliveness to do the same, hence horn speakers or whatever.
So in a way when someone like SG starts to discuss cerebral vs visceral, there is a tendency to at least start implying one has made some sort of objective discovery, e.g. "This system is *inherently* more emotional."
Whereas given the subjectivity in this hobby, it doesn't really pan out that way in practice.
(I certainly get conscious of the cerebral vs visceral in my own quest, and to that end I find palpability - a density and air-moving punch to the sound - to be something that engages me. Just like Steve G I long ago abandoned my Quad ESL 63s because of it. And yet, there are audiophiles who would never depart from their ESLs. And so it goes...)
I think most of us would recognize the phenomenon in ourselves. How many of us have found ourselves seemingly effortlessly engaged in music on our car stereo (even a not-so-great car stereo) sometimes in ways that seem to come with more difficulty from our main 2 channel systems?
That kind of thing.
The problem is, what amounts to a more "visceral/emotional" system vs cerebral tends to vary among audiophiles. One will feel only an old school British monitor will get them into the music and make them "forget" about analysis, others will say they need much more impact and aliveness to do the same, hence horn speakers or whatever.
So in a way when someone like SG starts to discuss cerebral vs visceral, there is a tendency to at least start implying one has made some sort of objective discovery, e.g. "This system is *inherently* more emotional."
Whereas given the subjectivity in this hobby, it doesn't really pan out that way in practice.
(I certainly get conscious of the cerebral vs visceral in my own quest, and to that end I find palpability - a density and air-moving punch to the sound - to be something that engages me. Just like Steve G I long ago abandoned my Quad ESL 63s because of it. And yet, there are audiophiles who would never depart from their ESLs. And so it goes...)