DO CABLES REALLY MATTER?

Prof,

I already addressed your concerns it in my statement and it wasn't confusing unless it's another game afoot. 

There are better made cables that allow more info to come forth. You've said as much earlier when you admitted that a minute amount improvement can't account for the big increases that some say they hear and appreciate. I say they do.

The signal measured shows everything to be okay but it doesn't take into account what is smeared or messed with by a lesser cable. They are tone controls after all but some do less damage than others. They may measure similar but can sound quite different. 

The smeared or compromised sound is not what's getting through in the final recording. It's what being heard while it happens. And it's repeatable until a better cable is used. Then, one can hear and appreciate the difference.


All the best,
Nonoise

A non sequitur can’t be “clarified.”

One construction is that latent data is passed on by crap cables that is somehow made manifest by superior cable. 

I am the parackete of Caborka....

Sorry nonoise, I still can’t make heads or tails of what you are saying, and I see nothing addressing the point I had repeated to you. (I think maritime51 is right about this, but I’ll try pressing on for a moment).

There are better made cables that allow more info to come forth.

That’s the very claim that is being questioned here. What is your evidence for this? Take a standard Belden 10-gauge 5T00UP for, say, a 6 foot speaker cable run. I choose this because Belden has been making professional industry standard cables for decades upon decades, know what they are doing, and because one can find test measurements for this cable, e.g:

https://www.audioholics.com/gadget-reviews/blue-jeans-10awg-speaker-cable-5t00up/blue-jeans-cable-me...



Can you point to independent measurements of a high end audiophile cable showing it transmits "more info?"

You’ve said as much earlier when you admitted that a minute amount improvement can’t account for the big increases that some say they hear and appreciate.

Essentially, yes. But you seem to mistakenly infer I have agreed that people actually ARE hearing the BIG improvements they claim, rather than it being from bias/imagination etc. Maybe some people are hearing real differences; but it's hard to discern in which cases that may be,  when it's all anecdote with no controlling for imagination and bias.

I say they do.

Well....anyone can say anything. But that’s called "begging the question" given what is under debate.

The signal measured shows everything to be okay but it doesn’t take into account what is smeared or messed with by a lesser cable.

Wait, so you are saying a standard cable can measure just fine, but the measurements don’t take in to account "smearing and messing up" of the signal? That’s not making sense; can you explain better? How do you know a cable is smearing/messing things up....if measurements show it’s passing the signal fine?

The smeared or compromised sound is not what’s getting through in the final recording. It’s what being heard while it happens. And it’s repeatable until a better cable is used. Then, one can hear and appreciate the difference.

Try as I might, I can make no sense of that paragraph. (Can anyone else parse what nonoise is trying to say?)

I still don’t see how you have addressed the issue I raised: IF you are hearing wonderful sonics from a recording that was created using regular cables, THEN that tells you what type of sonic information those regular cables are capable of transmitting.

Sorry, “Paraclete.”  🙀

Golly gee. 

The symbol is NOT the thing symbolized; the word is NOT the thing; the map is NOT the territory it stands for. 

What is being measured is not the sound:. it's the electrical properties of the signal.

All the best,
Nonoise