Ohm Walsh Micro Talls: who's actually heard 'em?


Hi,

I'd love to hear the impressions of people who've actually spent some time with these speakers to share their sense of their plusses and minuses. Mapman here on Audiogon is a big fan, and has shared lots on them, but I'm wondering who else might be familiar with them.
rebbi
ohm has the same character thoughout the line...a lost art for most brands...in a bigger room, the 100 would have more bass, provided the amp will control them.
Jaybo is correct. I've had the micro's and moved to the 100's when I had a room change. The signature is the same just more bass and they play a bit louder from what John has told me (I don't really crank my tunes).
I've confirmed with my system that 100s and Walsh 5s sound mostly the same in a small to moderate sized room.

If you do not have bass deficiencies, there is no reason to go larger in a room of a particular size.

Larger rooms will benefit in bass and overall performance weight from larger Ohm Walsh models.

In my largest room, ~ 20'X 30' and L shaped, the difference from 100s to Walsh 5 is marginal as I've described.

The Walsh 5's could go in much larger rooms than any of mine.