Ohm Walsh Micro Talls: who's actually heard 'em?

In one of my emails to John Strohbeen, he said that he preferred amplifiers with high dynamic power ratings into low impedences. He said that the MWT dips to about 4 ohms at the low frequency cut off, but it's above 8 most of the time.

Just a little more info from the field - When I switched from a McIntosh MA 6200 to my current Cyrus 8vs2, I noticed extended bass with a lot more control. I'm sure there are a lot of factors, but one that I keep thinking of, is the high damping factor of the Cyrus...

Map,

I'm using subs - so it's hard for me to say much about the low end. John S told me that the 100s don't fall below 4.8 ohms, so a tube amp might work well. However, quick impressions reveal that the tonal balance of the speaker shifts noticeably with my Prima Lunas (4 ohm taps). I'm going to try the 8 ohm taps next to see what happens. Stay tuned..

Marty

PS If I get the energy, I'll rewire for full range operation with my ARC VT-130SE amp. The ARC is balanced in only, so rewiring is a pain in the ass, so that's a fairly big "if".

"quick impressions reveal that the tonal balance of the speaker shifts noticeably with my Prima Lunas "

That is what I would expect with most tube amps given the variable impedance of the Ohms at various frequencies as I understand it.

The CLass D Bel Canto amps would do very well in terms of maintaining proper tonal balance in the low end I believe.

My belief is that somewhat higher damping factors (>10 say) also benefit and I did look for that also when choosing an amp.

Looks like all ohms have a thick metallic grill around the driver, does it not hinder the sound?

Deadlyvj,

It's not a thick metallic grille, but more of a thin wire mesh material with what looks like some sort of foam liner. And it's supposed to be acoustically transparent.