The Truth about Modern Class D


All my amps right now are Class D. ICEpower in the living room, and NAD D 3020 in the bedroom.

I’ve had several audiophiles come to my home and not one has ever said "Oh, that sounds like Class D."

Having said this, if I could afford them AND had the room, I’d be tempted to switch for a pair of Ayre monoblocks or Conrad Johnson Premiere 12s and very little else.

I’m not religious about Class D. They sound great for me, low power, easy to hide, but if a lot of cash and the need to upgrade ever hits me, I could be persuaded.

The point: Good modern Class D amps just sound like really good amplifiers, with the usual speaker/source matching issues.

You don’t have to go that route, but it’s time we shrugged off the myths and descriptions of Class D that come right out of the 1980’s.
erik_squires
As it stands now the switching frequency noise output filter, has phase shift effects that reach right down to 5khz, that doubled for the worse at 10khz and doubled worse again 20khz. That's what many listeners find objectionable, in the upper mids and highs.
This statement is false. The filter is set to be operational at a fairly high frequency, and are usually 12 db per octave filters. 6 db/octave filters exhibit phase shift over the widest range, so if the pole frequency is at 90KHz you could see some artifact at 9KHz but not at 5KHz. But most filters I've seen are 12db/octave and so don't have phase shift artifact anywhere within the audio passband.

What many listeners likely 'find objectionable' is not the filter- its likely something else. Several issues exist that can account for that- higher ordered harmonics caused by poor loop feedback implementation, breakdown of the encoding scheme at higher volume levels, distortion from the input circuit... but its not the filter. IME a good class D amp has artifacts, but not the kind typical to traditional solid state, so in many cases I find especially the later generations to be more musical than traditional solid state.
@lukaske  
@toetapaudio

Note the VERITAS Monoblocks from Merrill Audio used the Hypex NC1200 module for years. It was tested by many audiophiles and societies against other implementations and was found to still be the best. 

We now have a new proprietary Class D design from Merrill Audio on the Oganesson Line of amps. These are an order of magnitude better then the VERITAS or anything else in that group. 

What makes the difference in the use of GaN transistors. Tthe MOSFETS in the prior Class D designs, including the Hypex simply cannot do what the GaN transistors can. 

Other Class D designs, including the Hypex NC1200 utilize heavy feedback which tend to have loss of detail and become sluggy. Now imagine no feedback loops. That brings a new sense of ease and air to the music, along with a strong, fast attack, yet no overhang or edge. 

Soon the discussion will shift to who has the best Class D versus is Class D good. We believe we are leading the way on that.
I am in agreement with Erik. I have a Class D integrated hybrid amp and if it suffers from switching distortion or dead time, I sure as hell can't hear it. Granted, I haven't been able to compare it to dozens of other amps, class D, AB, A, or otherwise. But what I have had in the past which was a McIntosh C-45 preamp and MC-402 poweramp. It took less than 5 minutes out of the box (new Class D) cold and not broken in yet, to tell it was vastly superior to the Mac gear. It has what a lot of you considered outdated Hypex 400 modules and to my ears still sounds wonderful. I have been exposed to the expensive exotic stuff over the years and don't feel I'm missing much in resolution, dynamics, smoothness, musicality or whatever. There are several of you that seem to think Class D is almost unlistenable, probably in not so many words. Why so many of you have to make such a big deal about it is beyond me. What many of you will realize is class D is the future of audio amplification. I believe that is inevitable. IMO.