I wrote that post back in August. Since then, I’ve made several major changes to my system. And the Cyrus/Schitt combo sounds wonderful, and much better than the Oppo 105 by itself, as it should.
Oppo 105 D vs. DAC-transport combination.
To my great dismay, the more I listen, I’m finding my Oppo 105 is outperforming a very well thought of DAC and transport combination for which I paid 3x the price. Basically the sound stage is wider and better defined.
Both the DAC and transport are less than a year old. I thought I was upgrading.
Played by itself, the DAC-transport combo sounds great. Until I compare it to the Oppo.
I can’t understand it!
Both the DAC and transport are less than a year old. I thought I was upgrading.
Played by itself, the DAC-transport combo sounds great. Until I compare it to the Oppo.
I can’t understand it!
- ...
- 88 posts total
@glupson. Sorry I missed your post a few weeks ago, but I couldn’t agree with you more. I currently play my SACDS by outputting the DSD layer from my Oppo 105 over HDMI into a Bryston DAC3 in 2 channel, and it’s superb. Comparison with lps? Puh-leeze. I have to start learning to restrain myself when someone says lps are more holographic, or whatever. With my SACDs I frequently feel as if the musicians are in the same space. With vinyl I feel that they are embedded in wax and simultaneously drowning in a bowl of Rice Krispies. melm I use an Oppo 105 and I disagree that it sounds inferior to the same discs burned to a HD. When I listen to those same discs burned to my NAS, using the Network function of the Oppo, and switch from disc to NAS, at best, the NAS sounds equal to disc playback, and frequently the NAS sounds just a bit worse. i won’t be throwing out my CDs now after I burn them. Ymmv |
@rvpiano No doubt that your Cyrus/Schiit combo sounded better than a stock Oppo 105. A stock Oppo 105 is ok and somewhat unlistentable when playing standard resolution materials eg CD especially bad recording CD. The stock 205 is quite a bit better than the stock 105 actually and is more listenable or acceptable than the stock 105. Now the Modwright Oppo 205 even sounded significantly better than the Modwright Oppo 105. Modwright mod on the 205 is lot more extensive and comprehensive compared to that of the Modwright mod on the 105, which includes a replacement of a stock stereo op-amp with a discrete class A stereo analog audio output stages on the Modwright 205 only. It also includes a total comprehensive redesign that results in true differential or fully balanced design stereo analog output stages on the fully modded Modwright Oppo 205 only. When you use a really good quality power cord and XLR analog interconnects on the Modwright Oppo 205 you will have yourself a full enjoyment of your favorite 2ch music source playbacks. But if you are happy with the Cyrus/Schiit combo that’s what matters. But I was just saying that there are room for sonic improvements of your 2ch music playbacks when you go with a fully modded Modwright Oppo 205 compared to the Cyrus/Schiit combo. Plus you can also use the Modwright Oppo 205 for your AV playbacks eg bluray, 4k UHD bluray disc playbacks via HDMI to your either AV processor or receiver. And you won’t even need your 105 anymore. Fyi, the audio & video performances over HDMI is better on the 205 compared to that of the 105 when playing regular bluray movie discs. I have the 205 now but was previously using the 105 before. |
eric Replacing the stock power supply with a liner power module (china, huge toroid + incoming wiring harness) takes the 105 to a much richer level |
- 88 posts total