Rel B2 or JL Audio f 112

Rels seem to blend spectacularly well with main speakers when set up right. JL's have always sounded very muscular in my experience which is great fun. I don't know how well they blend with mains.

These are sufficiently expensive that if you have room for full range speakers that would be an interesting alternative.

One question and one "answer"
First this is the first time I've heard of voicing a sub to match mains. Seems a bit of a contradiction?

As for the F112 I have found that I cant tel the difference between my receiver crossover and the onboard. I bought the F112 as I thought it seemed to work better than the REL but at the most this is a likely subtle thing with room and placement playing. Anyway the JL crossover seems to work fine.

Paul,why would it be a contriction to to voice a sub to mains?Most manufacturers who offer all types of speakers do this.

I adore my sub 12. Amazing clarity and accuracy at a fraction of the cost. I haven't even used the PBK yet.

TP: I've always assumed that the sub carries little if any voice content. My understanding was that the voicing that "mattered" was the fronts and center to accommodate any dialog sweeping across the front. So I guess I am assuming that the sub carries different content than the fronts and center so matching was not an issue. I run my system crossed over for the sub at 80Hz and my fronts to Large and I cant really notice any difference beyond the obvious lack of LFE with the sub off.

Hmm. have to think on this. Learn something new every day eh?