+1 bigkidz. I don’t agree that “resolution” as defined by most audiophiles is necessary for realistic (accurate) microdynamics which is, as bigkidz says, what makes the music exciting. I suppose one could call it dynamic resolution, but that is not how the term is usually used. I have heard incredibly “resolving” gear which sounds dynamically dead. I have also heard gear that is not very “detailed” that sounds very dynamically alive; some vintage tube amplification comes to mind.
- ...
- 55 posts total
- 55 posts total