Do any of your Rolling Stones recordings bring "Satisfaction"?


Before I became a snobby audiophile I loved the Rolling Stones.  But as my system grew and I discovered all kinds of sounds in recordings (CD as well as Vinyl) that I had never heard before and the openness and depth of soundstage that was a wonder, I never had that same Wow moment with the Stones recordings.  Actually the best sound I have found came from the Hot Rocks double LP.  Has anyone else had a better experience with their recordings?  Having gone through so many remasters, nothing seems to have changed.  Sticky Fingers should be something better than we get.  The opening riff of Brown Sugar has always seemed so muddy.  My rant, any thoughts?

udog
For my tastes Main Offender was/is a superior release from Keith.  Just my opinion.
I just picked up the clear vinyl 180 gram version of Beggar's Banquet and it sounds really good, better than the older London versions I have.
As primarily a Beatles fan I too yearned for better sound quality from my records as my system improved. Unfortunately the EMI / Hayes plant wasn't all it could be, and the recordings themselves suffered from a little too much 'bouncing down' from take to take.

Much later upon hearing various Kinks and Rolling Stones records I realised that the Beatles records actually sounded great in comparison. At least EMI / Abbey Road / George Martin insisted upon some kind of a standard for those initial recordings. You can't say the same for everyone else as the recording culture here in the UK was such that pop music was hardly taken seriously for decades.

Basically the Stones 60s output ( Brian Jones era) is listenable but don't expect sonic excellence. I loved my UK copy of Rolled Gold on vinyl for the music without caring too much for the sound. It was/is a little murky  with crushed bandwidth but it's OK.
Hi,
have you listened to Japanese pressings of Aftermath, TSMR, Flowers, Exile?
Voodoo Lounge original UK (DMM) is good also.