Pulsars and the Mythical Armchair Speaker Maker


There’s another thread going about Joseph Audio Pulsar speakers which I did not want to derail, but it is showing up some common logical fallacies and dead ends I wanted to talk about.


As anyone who has read my posts knows, I’m a huge proponent of DIY for speakers and cables especially. Not that I think you should only go with DIY but because the more audiophiles who can build their own we have in the community the less snake oil gets spread around as fact and there’s less worshipping of the price tag as the almighty determiner of speaker performance.


The myth I want to talk about is kind of related. It is the idea that we should value speakers based purely on driver cost. JA’s Pulsars suffer from this because they seem to use off the shelf components, in very nice cabinets, with perfectly executed crossovers. The thing that I don’t understand are buyers who look at driver cost, and say "well, these speakers should cost no more than x amount, so I’m not buying them... "


I call hogwash. Speakers are more than a collection of parts. They are curated components brought together by a designer and manufacturer. Those same people who are likely to engage in this behavior:

  • Can’t actually design a speaker themselves
  • Would NEVER build a DIY speaker even as a complete kit because it doesn’t have a brand, nor would they buy an assembled DIY speaker.
  • Would probably go with a speaker with in-house drivers which have an even higher markup
  • May not have very good ears anyway


My point is, knowing the price of the parts does not make you at all qualified to judge what the final price should be. That is, fairly, in the hands of the market, and it doesn’t actually make you a better listener or more informed buyer. I would argue you end up buying speakers for brands with even more of a markup and more likely to have questionable performance.


It’s perfectly reasonable for a manufacturer to charge for parts, and skill. So, yes, talking tech and drivers and crossover components is always fun, but please stop evaluating the price of finished goods until you’ve attempted at least designing one pair yourself.

And again, DIY is a lot of fun, and if you want to go that way, you should, but let’s not denigrate high value, high quality manufacturers and delers by reducing them to part assemblers any more than you'd judge a restaurant based on the cost per pound of chicken.


Thank you,

E
erik_squires
Post removed 
wildfoxinn

I don’t see anyone suggesting the equivalent voodoo with the JA speakers. But the fact you are referring strictly to parts comparisons is I think to miss the point many are making in this thread.

Speaker designers end up voicing speakers in their own way - whatever parts they use. Given this, we may find ourselves really liking or preferring the way one speaker is voiced over another.

I’ve heard and auditioned a great number of speakers, many of which use proprietary drivers, or more expensive drivers than the JA speakers.But for whatever reason I just preferred the sound of the JA speakers. I did not hear that particular nature of "quietness/black background/complete lack of grain" in any of the other speakers that I hear every time I listen to the JA speakers. Their voicing seem to capture a wonderful combination of clarity, lack of etch along with a warmth voiced in to the sound so it still retains a really human, organic quality. If I heard those qualities to the same degree in some other speaker, it would be on my list. But I didn’t hear it, no matter how much more expensive the other speaker parts were.

Not saying the JA speakers are objectively better of course, just that they had a distinct sound to my ears that I preferred.

Because so much of the secret sauce of speaker design is in the crossover and other choices that create the voice of the speaker, pointing to the mere fact that another company - Ascend Acoustics - makes a box using more expensive drivers in no way guarantees those who like the JA sound would like the sound of the AA speakers "better."Parts quality alone doesn’t guarantee this.  The speaker designer may use similar drivers, but the sound will end up reflecting the specific goals/taste of the designer.





And ... we’re back to comparing the value of a meal by the weight of the steak.
And again, the ONLY thing that allows anyone to weigh the steak is the off the shelf drivers.

If they had an OEM maker turn them pink and call them custom made, this meat weighing would end immediately.
I wish someone would start a speaker co. invest in the tech to develope their own drivers, build quality custom cabinets and then design and bring to market a speaker that sounds better than the Pulsars and sell them for the cost of materials. I’d jump at such a bargain. It would be a good run for audiophiles while it lasted! Which wouldn’t be very long.